MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/europace/euj014

Медицинская библиотека · Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2006

Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemakers and heart failure: a double-blind, randomized crossover study.

Höijer Carl J, Meurling Carl, Brandt Johan

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

AIMS: To investigate whether patients with previously implanted conventional pacemakers and severe heart failure benefit from an upgrade to a biventricular system.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

Study inclusion criteria were New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes III and IV, dominant paced rhythm, and no left bundle branch block in the pre-pacing ECG. Ten patients with pacemakers (four VVIR due to slow atrial fibrillation and six DDDR, of which four were due to high-degree atrioventricular block and two to sinus node disease) were upgraded to a biventricular pacing (BVP) system. The median duration of pacing before the upgrade was 5.7 years. Assessments of 6-min walk test, symptom score, brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP), and echocardiography were made pre-operatively. After a run-in period of 1 month in BVP following the upgrade, the patients were randomized to a 2-month period in either BVP or right ventricular pacing (RVP), followed by 2 months in the other mode, in a double-blind crossover fashion. After each period, the pre-operative measurements were repeated. After study completion, patients were asked to select their preferred period. The median 6-min walking distance was significantly longer in BVP (400 m) vs. RVP (315 m), P = 0.02. The symptom score was also significantly better in BVP (P = 0.005). Median pro-BNP was significantly lower in BVP than in RVP, 3,030 vs. 5,064 ng/L (P = 0.005). Six patients demanded an early crossover in RVP but none in BVP (P = 0.015), and all patients except one expressed a preference for BVP. However, echo parameters did not show any significant differences between BVP and RVP.

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker patients with heart failure and dominant paced heart rhythm benefit substantially from an upgrade to BVP, in terms of physical performance and symptoms. The upgrade resulted in significantly improved cardiac function as reflected by reduced levels of pro-BNP.

Для цитирования: Höijer Carl J, Meurling Carl, Brandt Johan. Upgrade to biventricular pacing in patients with conventional pacemakers and heart failure: a double-blind, randomized crossover study.. Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2006. DOI: 10.1093/europace/euj014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.