MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.020

Медицинская библиотека · Urology · 2023

Within State Variability of Antimicrobial Susceptibility: Missouri as an Archetype to Assess Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Transurethral Procedures.

Wright Corbin C, Kanake Shubham, Golzy Mojgan, Malm-Buatsi Elizabeth, Murray Katie S, Rosen Geoffrey H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate variability among hospitals in susceptibility of common uropathogens to antimicrobial agents frequently used in transurethral procedures in order to examine whether state-based guidelines might be more appropriate than national prophylactic guidelines.

METHODS

Hospital-level antibiograms were requested from all hospitals throughout the state of Missouri. We studied Escherichia coli, Klebsiella, and Proteus sensitivities to evaluate common guideline recommended antimicrobials including trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX), third-generation cephalosporins, cefazolin, penicillin combinations, gentamicin, and fluoroquinolones. We evaluated variability and association between hospital characteristics and antimicrobial sensitivities.

RESULTS

Data was requested from 81 hospitals across the state and 38 provided the requested data (47% response rate). Susceptibility was highest for third-generation cephalosporins for E. coli (mean of 94%), Proteus (96%), and Klebsiella (96%). Gentamicin also had high susceptibility for the bacteria studied; 94% for E. coli and 96% for Klebsiella. Current first line recommended agents showed more modest coverage for E. coli (cefazolin 84%, TMP-SMX 78%), Proteus (cefazolin 82%, TMP-SMX 71%), and Klebsiella (cefazolin 90%, TMP-SMX 89%).

CONCLUSION

Post transurethral procedure infections are common. Rates can be limited with appropriate prophylaxis. Deciding on empirical coverage must take into account local resistance patterns. There is substantial variability among and within states in antimicrobial susceptibility for common uropathogens. When selecting antimicrobial prophylaxis, urologists should consider local- rather than state- or nation-level antibiograms, given the considerable variability. Future studies should consider the merits of very-broad spectrum prophylaxis and the potential role of molecular urinary pathogen (and pathogen-resistance) testing when selecting an optimal regimen.

Для цитирования: Wright Corbin C, Kanake Shubham, Golzy Mojgan, Malm-Buatsi Elizabeth, Murray Katie S, Rosen Geoffrey H. Within State Variability of Antimicrobial Susceptibility: Missouri as an Archetype to Assess Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Transurethral Procedures.. Urology. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.02.020.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.