The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2006
Identifying ELISPOT and skin test cut-offs for diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in The Gambia.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jeffries D J, Hill P C, Fox A, Lugos M, Jackson-Sillah D J, Adegbola R A, Brookes R H
Аннотация
SETTING: An urban area, The Gambia.
OBJECTIVE: To identify ELISPOT and PPD skin test cut-offs, targeting sensitivity and specificity equivalence.
DESIGN: Tuberculosis cases >5 years of age and their household contacts underwent ELISPOT, HIV and PPD skin tests. Cases and contacts sleeping in a different house were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity, providing two planes for estimating cut-offs. Specificity was adjusted for infection from previous exposure using a multivariate discrimination algorithm.
RESULTS: The point on the line of intersection of the planes that maximised sensitivity and specificity equivalence occurred at 4 spots (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-5, multiplier=0 ) for CFP-10 and 5.5 spots (4.5-8, multiplier=0 for ESAT-6), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 76% for both antigens. Combining ESAT-6 and CFP-10 using an 'or' statement yielded a maximum equivalence sensitivity and specificity of 76.5% at 6 spots for ESAT-6 and 11.5 spots for CFP-10. For the PPD skin test sensitivity and specificity, an equivalence of 78% occurred at 11 mm induration (9-13 mm).
CONCLUSION: An ELISPOT cut-off for ESAT-6 or CFP-10 could be set at 4-8 spot forming units (20-40 spots per million), with little benefit from combining the results. A cut-off of 9-13 mm for the PPD skin test is reasonable when comparing with the ELISPOT.
OBJECTIVE: To identify ELISPOT and PPD skin test cut-offs, targeting sensitivity and specificity equivalence.
DESIGN: Tuberculosis cases >5 years of age and their household contacts underwent ELISPOT, HIV and PPD skin tests. Cases and contacts sleeping in a different house were used to estimate sensitivity and specificity, providing two planes for estimating cut-offs. Specificity was adjusted for infection from previous exposure using a multivariate discrimination algorithm.
RESULTS: The point on the line of intersection of the planes that maximised sensitivity and specificity equivalence occurred at 4 spots (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.5-5, multiplier=0 ) for CFP-10 and 5.5 spots (4.5-8, multiplier=0 for ESAT-6), yielding a sensitivity and specificity of 76% for both antigens. Combining ESAT-6 and CFP-10 using an 'or' statement yielded a maximum equivalence sensitivity and specificity of 76.5% at 6 spots for ESAT-6 and 11.5 spots for CFP-10. For the PPD skin test sensitivity and specificity, an equivalence of 78% occurred at 11 mm induration (9-13 mm).
CONCLUSION: An ELISPOT cut-off for ESAT-6 or CFP-10 could be set at 4-8 spot forming units (20-40 spots per million), with little benefit from combining the results. A cut-off of 9-13 mm for the PPD skin test is reasonable when comparing with the ELISPOT.