Archives of internal medicine · 2001
Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis through casual contact with an infectious case.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Golub J E, Cronin W A, Obasanjo O O, Coggin W, Moore K, Pope D S, Thompson D, Sterling T R, Harrington S, Bishai W R, Chaisson R E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: An ongoing restriction fragment length polymorphism study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from tuberculosis cases showed an identical 12-band IS6110 pattern unique to 3 unrelated patients (Patients A-C) diagnosed as having tuberculosis within a 9-month period.
METHODS: In an attempt to identify epidemiologic links between the 3 patients, we performed site visits to the retail business work site of patient A and conducted detailed interviews with all 3 patients and their contacts.
RESULTS: Patient B had visited patient A's work site 3 times during patient A's infectious period, spending no more than 15 minutes each time. Patient C visited patient A's work site on 6 to 10 occasions during this period for no more than 45 minutes at any one time. There were no other epidemiologic links between these 3 cases other than the contact at the store. Contact investigation identified 4 tuberculin skin test conversions among 8 (50%) of patient A's coworkers, 6 positive tests among 15 household contacts (40%), and 8 positive tests among 16 identified customers who were casual contacts (50%). Patient B and patient C were most likely infected by patient A during one of their brief visits to patient A's work site.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that some tuberculosis is spread through casual contact not normally pursued in traditional contact investigations and that, in certain situations, M tuberculosis can be transmitted despite minimal duration of exposure. In addition, this outbreak emphasizes the importance of DNA fingerprinting data for identifying unusual transmission in unexpected settings.
METHODS: In an attempt to identify epidemiologic links between the 3 patients, we performed site visits to the retail business work site of patient A and conducted detailed interviews with all 3 patients and their contacts.
RESULTS: Patient B had visited patient A's work site 3 times during patient A's infectious period, spending no more than 15 minutes each time. Patient C visited patient A's work site on 6 to 10 occasions during this period for no more than 45 minutes at any one time. There were no other epidemiologic links between these 3 cases other than the contact at the store. Contact investigation identified 4 tuberculin skin test conversions among 8 (50%) of patient A's coworkers, 6 positive tests among 15 household contacts (40%), and 8 positive tests among 16 identified customers who were casual contacts (50%). Patient B and patient C were most likely infected by patient A during one of their brief visits to patient A's work site.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that some tuberculosis is spread through casual contact not normally pursued in traditional contact investigations and that, in certain situations, M tuberculosis can be transmitted despite minimal duration of exposure. In addition, this outbreak emphasizes the importance of DNA fingerprinting data for identifying unusual transmission in unexpected settings.