MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12891-026-10103-9

Медицинская библиотека · BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026

Bone versus soft tissue hydatid disease: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

Demir İbrahim Halil, Çolak Tahsin Sami, Karaca Mustafa Onur, Demiryürek Mehmet, Kaya Onur, Perktaş İdris, Yildiz Hüseyin Yusuf

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal hydatid disease is uncommon and often mimics neoplastic lesions. Comparative evidence between bone and soft tissue involvement remains limited. We aimed to compare demographic characteristics, laboratory parameters and surgical outcomes between bone and soft tissue hydatid disease in an endemic region.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 64 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for histopathologically confirmed musculoskeletal hydatid disease between January 2010 and January 2024 (bone, n = 26; soft tissue, n = 38). Groups were compared regarding demographics, presenting symptoms, inflammatory indices White Blood Cell Count (WBC), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Eosinophil count, Eosinophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (ELR), hemagglutination test, cyst morphology (uni- vs. multilocular), complications, concomitant liver/lung involvement, and recurrence. Appropriate parametric/non-parametric and categorical tests were used.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics and baseline WBC/ESR/CRP and hemagglutination positivity did not differ between groups. Bone involvement presented predominantly with pain (22/26, 84.6%), whereas soft tissue disease frequently presented with isolated swelling (20/38, 52.6%) (p = 0.001). Eosinophil count (2.00 ± 1.26 vs. 0.89 ± 0.68; p = 0.013) and ELR (0.23 ± 0.13 vs. 0.12 ± 0.08; p = 0.014) were significantly higher in bone disease. Bone involvement had higher rates of intraoperative rupture (20/26, 76.9% vs. 10/38, 26.3%; p = 0.005), concomitant organ involvement (14/26, 53.8% vs. 8/38, 21.1%; p = 0.045), and recurrence (20/26, 76.9% vs. 8/38, 21.1%; p = 0.002). Multiloculated morphology was more frequent in soft tissue lesions (30/38, 78.9% vs. 10/26, 38.5%; p = 0.005). Among the cases treated for bone hydatid cysts, recurrence was observed in 20 out of 26 patients, while anaphylaxis occurred in 15 out of 26 patients during surgery. In contrast, among 38 patients who underwent surgery for soft tissue hydatid cysts, recurrence was observed in 8 (p = 0.002) and anaphylaxis developed in 7 during surgery (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Bone hydatid disease demonstrates a more aggressive clinical course than soft tissue disease, with substantially higher rupture, recurrence, and concomitant organ involvement rates. Elevated eosinophil count and ELR at presentation may support the suspicion of bone involvement. Future prospective studies incorporating multivariable modeling are warranted to identify independent predictors of recurrence.

Для цитирования: Demir İbrahim Halil, Çolak Tahsin Sami, Karaca Mustafa Onur, Demiryürek Mehmet, Kaya Onur, Perktaş İdris, Yildiz Hüseyin Yusuf. Bone versus soft tissue hydatid disease: a retrospective comparative cohort study.. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2026. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-026-10103-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.