Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
Outer retinal band segmentation in healthy subjects: comparative study between human grading and deep convolutional neural networks.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Afonso João Duarte, Camacho Pedro, Pereira Bruno, Marques João Pedro, Lopes Daniel Simões, Cabral Diogo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate identification of outer retinal bands (ORBs) on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) is clinically important for the assessment and monitoring of several retinal diseases. However, manual segmentation of these ORBs is time-consuming and subject to considerable intra- and inter-observer variability. Deep convolutional neural networks (dCNNs) offer a promising approach for achieving more consistent and reproducible segmentation of retinal microstructures, yet their performance for individual ORBs and their dependence on grader reliability remain insufficiently characterized. The aim of this study was to compare manual grading and different dCNN architectures for the segmentation of individual ORBs in healthy subjects, while assessing the reproducibility of human annotations and the performance of automated methods.
METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using foveal-centered SD-OCT scans obtained from healthy participants. Manual segmentation of the second hyperreflective band (Band 2), the third and fourth hyperreflective bands (Band 3+4) and photoreceptor outer segments (POS) was performed by two trained graders using onboard OCT software. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Human annotations were used to train different dCNNs pretrained with Sparse masked modelling on unlabelled data. The performance of the dCNNs was evaluated using dice score and pixel difference analyses.
RESULTS: One hundred eyes of healthy subjects were included. The intraclass correlation values were 0.737 (0.689, 0.779), 0.830 (0.795, 0.860) and 0.878 (0.852, 0.900), and the ICCs were 0.104 (-0.049, 0.253), 0.810 (0.740, 0.862) and 0.752 (0.678, 0.812) for Band 2, Band 3+4 and POS, respectively. From the dCNN, DRUNET showed the best performance: 0.916 for Band 2, 0.924 for Band 3+4 and 0.910 for POS. Pixel difference analysis between DRUNET and grader 1 showed a deviation of 0.89±0.44.
CONCLUSIONS: Manual segmentation of ORBs demonstrated moderate to high repeatability, whereas Band 2 segmentation showed low reproducibility. DRUNET outperformed other dCNN architectures, showing great potential to reduce inter-observer variability.
METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using foveal-centered SD-OCT scans obtained from healthy participants. Manual segmentation of the second hyperreflective band (Band 2), the third and fourth hyperreflective bands (Band 3+4) and photoreceptor outer segments (POS) was performed by two trained graders using onboard OCT software. Reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Human annotations were used to train different dCNNs pretrained with Sparse masked modelling on unlabelled data. The performance of the dCNNs was evaluated using dice score and pixel difference analyses.
RESULTS: One hundred eyes of healthy subjects were included. The intraclass correlation values were 0.737 (0.689, 0.779), 0.830 (0.795, 0.860) and 0.878 (0.852, 0.900), and the ICCs were 0.104 (-0.049, 0.253), 0.810 (0.740, 0.862) and 0.752 (0.678, 0.812) for Band 2, Band 3+4 and POS, respectively. From the dCNN, DRUNET showed the best performance: 0.916 for Band 2, 0.924 for Band 3+4 and 0.910 for POS. Pixel difference analysis between DRUNET and grader 1 showed a deviation of 0.89±0.44.
CONCLUSIONS: Manual segmentation of ORBs demonstrated moderate to high repeatability, whereas Band 2 segmentation showed low reproducibility. DRUNET outperformed other dCNN architectures, showing great potential to reduce inter-observer variability.