MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0268892

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2022

Mapping HIV prevalence in Nigeria using small area estimates to develop a targeted HIV intervention strategy.

O'Brien-Carelli Caitlin, Steuben Krista, Stafford Kristen A, Aliogo Rukevwe, Alagi Matthias, Johanns Casey K, Ibrahim Jahun, Shiraishi Ray, Ehoche Akipu, Greby Stacie, Dirlikov Emilio, Ibrahim Dalhatu, Bronson Megan, Aliyu Gambo, Aliyu Sani, Dwyer-Lindgren Laura, Swaminathan Mahesh, Duber Herbert C, Charurat Man

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Although geographically specific data can help target HIV prevention and treatment strategies, Nigeria relies on national- and state-level estimates for policymaking and intervention planning. We calculated sub-state estimates along the HIV continuum of care in Nigeria.

DESIGN

Using data from the Nigeria HIV/AIDS Indicator and Impact Survey (NAIIS) (July-December 2018), we conducted a geospatial analysis estimating three key programmatic indicators: prevalence of HIV infection among adults (aged 15-64 years); antiretroviral therapy (ART) coverage among adults living with HIV; and viral load suppression (VLS) rate among adults living with HIV.

METHODS

We used an ensemble modeling method called stacked generalization to analyze available covariates and a geostatistical model to incorporate the output from stacking as well as spatial autocorrelation in the modeled outcomes. Separate models were fitted for each indicator. Finally, we produced raster estimates of each indicator on an approximately 5×5-km grid and estimates at the sub-state/local government area (LGA) and state level.

RESULTS

Estimates for all three indicators varied both within and between states. While state-level HIV prevalence ranged from 0.3% (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 0.3%-0.5%]) to 4.3% (95% UI: 3.7%-4.9%), LGA prevalence ranged from 0.2% (95% UI: 0.1%-0.5%) to 8.5% (95% UI: 5.8%-12.2%). Although the range in ART coverage did not substantially differ at state level (25.6%-76.9%) and LGA level (21.9%-81.9%), the mean absolute difference in ART coverage between LGAs within states was 16.7 percentage points (range, 3.5-38.5 percentage points). States with large differences in ART coverage between LGAs also showed large differences in VLS-regardless of level of effective treatment coverage-indicating that state-level geographic targeting may be insufficient to address coverage gaps.

CONCLUSION

Geospatial analysis across the HIV continuum of care can effectively highlight sub-state variation and identify areas that require further attention in order to achieve epidemic control. By generating local estimates, governments, donors, and other implementing partners will be better positioned to conduct targeted interventions and prioritize resource distribution.

Для цитирования: O'Brien-Carelli Caitlin, Steuben Krista, Stafford Kristen A, Aliogo Rukevwe, Alagi Matthias, Johanns Casey K, Ibrahim Jahun, Shiraishi Ray, Ehoche Akipu, Greby Stacie, Dirlikov Emilio, Ibrahim Dalhatu, Bronson Megan, Aliyu Gambo, Aliyu Sani, Dwyer-Lindgren Laura, Swaminathan Mahesh, Duber Herbert C, Charurat Man. Mapping HIV prevalence in Nigeria using small area estimates to develop a targeted HIV intervention strategy.. PloS one. 2022. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268892.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.