Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2020
Creating HIV risk profiles for men in South Africa: a latent class approach using cross-sectional survey data.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gottert Ann, Pulerwitz Julie, Heck Craig J, Cawood Cherie, Mathur Sanyukta
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Engaging at-risk men in HIV prevention programs and services is a current priority, yet there are few effective ways to identify which men are at highest risk or how to best reach them. In this study we generated multi-factor profiles of HIV acquisition/transmission risk for men in Durban, South Africa, to help inform targeted programming and service delivery.
METHODS: Data come from surveys with 947 men ages 20 to 40 conducted in two informal settlements from May to September 2017. Using latent class analysis (LCA), which detects a small set of underlying groups based on multiple dimensions, we identified classes based on nine HIV risk factors and socio-demographic characteristics. We then compared HIV service use between the classes.
RESULTS: We identified four latent classes, with good model fit statistics. The older high-risk class (20% of the sample; mean age 36) were more likely married/cohabiting and employed, with multiple sexual partners, substantial age-disparity with partners (eight years younger on-average), transactional relationships (including more resource-intensive forms like paying for partner's rent), and hazardous drinking. The younger high-risk class (24%; mean age 27) were likely unmarried and employed, with the highest probability of multiple partners in the last year (including 42% with 5+ partners), transactional relationships (less resource-intensive, e.g., clothes/transportation), hazardous drinking, and inequitable gender views. The younger moderate-risk class (36%; mean age 23) were most likely unmarried, unemployed technical college/university students/graduates. They had a relatively high probability of multiple partners and transactional relationships (less resource-intensive), and moderate hazardous drinking. Finally, the older low-risk class (20%; mean age 29) were more likely married/cohabiting, employed, and highly gender-equitable, with few partners and limited transactional relationships. Circumcision (status) was higher among the younger moderate-risk class than either high-risk class (p < 0.001). HIV testing and treatment literacy score were suboptimal and did not differ across classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct HIV risk profiles among men were identified. Interventions should focus on reaching the highest-risk profiles who, despite their elevated risk, were less or no more likely than the lower-risk to use HIV services. By enabling a more synergistic understanding of subgroups, LCA has potential to enable more strategic, data-driven programming and evaluation.
METHODS: Data come from surveys with 947 men ages 20 to 40 conducted in two informal settlements from May to September 2017. Using latent class analysis (LCA), which detects a small set of underlying groups based on multiple dimensions, we identified classes based on nine HIV risk factors and socio-demographic characteristics. We then compared HIV service use between the classes.
RESULTS: We identified four latent classes, with good model fit statistics. The older high-risk class (20% of the sample; mean age 36) were more likely married/cohabiting and employed, with multiple sexual partners, substantial age-disparity with partners (eight years younger on-average), transactional relationships (including more resource-intensive forms like paying for partner's rent), and hazardous drinking. The younger high-risk class (24%; mean age 27) were likely unmarried and employed, with the highest probability of multiple partners in the last year (including 42% with 5+ partners), transactional relationships (less resource-intensive, e.g., clothes/transportation), hazardous drinking, and inequitable gender views. The younger moderate-risk class (36%; mean age 23) were most likely unmarried, unemployed technical college/university students/graduates. They had a relatively high probability of multiple partners and transactional relationships (less resource-intensive), and moderate hazardous drinking. Finally, the older low-risk class (20%; mean age 29) were more likely married/cohabiting, employed, and highly gender-equitable, with few partners and limited transactional relationships. Circumcision (status) was higher among the younger moderate-risk class than either high-risk class (p < 0.001). HIV testing and treatment literacy score were suboptimal and did not differ across classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Distinct HIV risk profiles among men were identified. Interventions should focus on reaching the highest-risk profiles who, despite their elevated risk, were less or no more likely than the lower-risk to use HIV services. By enabling a more synergistic understanding of subgroups, LCA has potential to enable more strategic, data-driven programming and evaluation.