Eye (London, England) · 2022
The prognostic implication of visual acuity at the time of uveal melanoma diagnosis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Asplund Elin, Fili Maria, Pansell Tony, Brautaset Rune, Nilsson Maria, Stålhammar Gustav
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Visual outcomes after primary tumour treatment of uveal melanoma (UM) have been investigated repeatedly. This study evaluates the correlation between best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) before treatment with clinicopathological factors and patient survival.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Pre-treatment BCVA was examined in relation to tumour dimensions and location, and survival in a retrospective cohort of 1809 patients who underwent plaque brachytherapy. BCVA was also correlated to tumour histological factors in a second cohort of 137 enucleated eyes.
RESULTS: The mean BCVA of the tumour eye prior to plaque brachytherapy was LogMAR 0.42 (SD 0.46). Patients with low BCVA (LogMAR ≥ 1.00) did not differ in age (p = 0.19) and had similar frequency of ciliary body involvement (p = 0.99) but had tumours with greater apical thickness (p < 0.0001), greater diameter (p < 0.0001) and shorter distance to the optic disc and fovea (p < 0.0001). There were no significant relations between low BCVA and any of 13 examined tumour histological factors at a Bonferroni-corrected significance level (p > 0.004). Patients with low BCVA had greater incidence of UM-related mortality in competing risk analysis (p = 0.0019) and shorter overall survival (p < 0.0001). Low BCVA was also associated with increased hazard ratio (HR) for UM-related mortality in univariate analysis (HR 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.9), but not in multivariate analysis with tumour size and location as covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: UM patients with low BCVA before primary tumour treatment have a worse prognosis, likely related to increased tumour dimensions. Future studies should examine the prognostic significance of BCVA in relation to macula-involving retinal detachment and genetic factors.
SUBJECTS/METHODS: Pre-treatment BCVA was examined in relation to tumour dimensions and location, and survival in a retrospective cohort of 1809 patients who underwent plaque brachytherapy. BCVA was also correlated to tumour histological factors in a second cohort of 137 enucleated eyes.
RESULTS: The mean BCVA of the tumour eye prior to plaque brachytherapy was LogMAR 0.42 (SD 0.46). Patients with low BCVA (LogMAR ≥ 1.00) did not differ in age (p = 0.19) and had similar frequency of ciliary body involvement (p = 0.99) but had tumours with greater apical thickness (p < 0.0001), greater diameter (p < 0.0001) and shorter distance to the optic disc and fovea (p < 0.0001). There were no significant relations between low BCVA and any of 13 examined tumour histological factors at a Bonferroni-corrected significance level (p > 0.004). Patients with low BCVA had greater incidence of UM-related mortality in competing risk analysis (p = 0.0019) and shorter overall survival (p < 0.0001). Low BCVA was also associated with increased hazard ratio (HR) for UM-related mortality in univariate analysis (HR 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 1.9), but not in multivariate analysis with tumour size and location as covariates.
CONCLUSIONS: UM patients with low BCVA before primary tumour treatment have a worse prognosis, likely related to increased tumour dimensions. Future studies should examine the prognostic significance of BCVA in relation to macula-involving retinal detachment and genetic factors.