Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2020
Parkinson's disease polygenic risk score is not associated with impulse control disorders: A longitudinal study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ihle J, Artaud F, Bekadar S, Mangone G, Sambin S, Mariani L L, Bertrand H, Rascol O, Durif F, Derkinderen P, Scherzer C, Elbaz A, Corvol J C, DIGPD study group, Steering committee, Statistical analyses, Principal investigators for sites, Co-investigators (alphabetical order), Neuropsychologists, Genetic core, Sponsor activities and clinical research assistants
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between a Parkinson's disease (PD) polygenic risk score (PRS) and impulse control disorders (ICDs) in PD.
BACKGROUND: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have brought forth a PRS associated with increased risk of PD and younger disease onset. ICDs are frequent adverse effects of dopaminergic drugs and are also more frequent in patients with younger disease onset. It is unknown whether ICDs and PD share genetic susceptibility.
METHODS: We used data from a multicenter longitudinal cohort of PD patients with annual visits up to 6 years (DIG-PD). At each visit ICDs, defined as compulsive gambling, buying, eating, or sexual behavior were evaluated by movement disorders specialists. We genotyped DNAs using the Megachip assay (Illumina) and calculated a weighted PRS based on 90 SNPs associated with PD. We estimated the association between PRS and prevalence of ICDs at each visit using Poisson generalized estimating equations, adjusted for dopaminergic treatment and other known risk factors for ICDs.
RESULTS: Of 403 patients, 185 developed ICDs. Patients with younger age at onset had a higher prevalence of ICDs (p < 0.001) as well as higher PRS values (p = 0.06). At baseline, there was no association between the PRS and ICDs (overall, p = 0.84). The prevalence of ICDs increased over time similarly across the quartiles of the PRS (overall, p = 0.88; DA users, p = 0.99).
CONCLUSION: Despite younger disease onset being associated with both higher PRS and ICD prevalence, our findings are not in favor of common susceptibility genes for PD and ICDs.
BACKGROUND: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have brought forth a PRS associated with increased risk of PD and younger disease onset. ICDs are frequent adverse effects of dopaminergic drugs and are also more frequent in patients with younger disease onset. It is unknown whether ICDs and PD share genetic susceptibility.
METHODS: We used data from a multicenter longitudinal cohort of PD patients with annual visits up to 6 years (DIG-PD). At each visit ICDs, defined as compulsive gambling, buying, eating, or sexual behavior were evaluated by movement disorders specialists. We genotyped DNAs using the Megachip assay (Illumina) and calculated a weighted PRS based on 90 SNPs associated with PD. We estimated the association between PRS and prevalence of ICDs at each visit using Poisson generalized estimating equations, adjusted for dopaminergic treatment and other known risk factors for ICDs.
RESULTS: Of 403 patients, 185 developed ICDs. Patients with younger age at onset had a higher prevalence of ICDs (p < 0.001) as well as higher PRS values (p = 0.06). At baseline, there was no association between the PRS and ICDs (overall, p = 0.84). The prevalence of ICDs increased over time similarly across the quartiles of the PRS (overall, p = 0.88; DA users, p = 0.99).
CONCLUSION: Despite younger disease onset being associated with both higher PRS and ICD prevalence, our findings are not in favor of common susceptibility genes for PD and ICDs.