MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ofid/ofae180

Медицинская библиотека · Open forum infectious diseases · 2024

Asynchronous Video Directly Observed Therapy to Monitor Short-Course Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Garfein Richard S, Liu Lin, Cepeda Javier, Graves Susannah, San Miguel Stacie, Antonio Antonette, Cuevas-Mota Jazmine, Mercer Valerie, Miller McKayla, Catanzaro Donald G, Rios Phillip, Raab Fredric, Benson Constance A

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Observing medication ingestion through self-recorded videos (video directly observed therapy [VDOT]) has been shown to be a cost-effective alternative to in-person directly observed therapy (DOT) for monitoring adherence to treatment for tuberculosis disease. VDOT could be a useful tool to monitor short-course latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing VDOT (intervention) and clinic-based DOT (control) among patients newly diagnosed with LTBI who agreed to a once-weekly 3-month treatment regimen of isoniazid and rifapentine. Study outcomes were treatment completion and patient satisfaction. We also assessed costs. Pre- and posttreatment interviews were conducted.

RESULTS

Between March 2016 and December 2019, 130 participants were assigned to VDOT (n = 68) or DOT (n = 62). Treatment completion (73.5% vs 69.4%, P = .70) and satisfaction with treatment monitoring (92.1% vs 86.7%, P = .39) were slightly higher in the intervention group than the control group, but neither was statistically significant. VDOT cost less per patient (median, $230; range, $182-$393) vs DOT (median, $312; range, $246-$592) if participants used their own smartphone.

CONCLUSIONS

While both groups reported high treatment satisfaction, VDOT was not associated with higher LTBI treatment completion. However, VDOT cost less than DOT. Volunteer bias might have reduced the observed effect since patients opposed to any treatment monitoring could have opted for alternative unobserved regimens. Given similar outcomes and lower cost, VDOT may be useful for treatment monitoring when in-person observation is prohibited or unavailable (eg, during a respiratory disease outbreak). The trial was registered at the National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov NTC02641106).

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NTC02641106; registered 24 October 2016.

Для цитирования: Garfein Richard S, Liu Lin, Cepeda Javier, Graves Susannah, San Miguel Stacie, Antonio Antonette, Cuevas-Mota Jazmine, Mercer Valerie, Miller McKayla, Catanzaro Donald G, Rios Phillip, Raab Fredric, Benson Constance A. Asynchronous Video Directly Observed Therapy to Monitor Short-Course Latent Tuberculosis Infection Treatment: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.. Open forum infectious diseases. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofae180.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.