MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.25100/cm.v50i3.4078

Медицинская библиотека · Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia) · 2019

Thematic synthesis HIV prevention qualitative studies in men who have sex with men (MSM).

Mathias Augusto, Alves Dos Santos Lorruan, Grangeiro Alexandre, Couto Marcia Thereza

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Qualitative studies on HIV prevention strategies and methods among men who have sex with men (MSM) allow identify knowledge gaps and improve preventive actions.

OBJECTIVE

To make a thematic synthesis of the scientific productions that use the qualitative methodology in the strategies and methods of HIV prevention area among MSM.

METHODS

We conducted a literature review following the guidelines of the ENTREQ protocol. The analysis included 48 empirical studies published in Portuguese, English and Spanish between 2001 and 2018 available in the Medline, Embase, Scielo, Scopus, Bireme and Web of Science databases.

RESULTS

Where an increased production in the last six years and concentration in northern countries. Seven prevention methods were part of the study, with emphasis on pre-exposure prophylaxis, testing, condoms and behavioral strategies. The main topics discussed were stigma and support and care networks.

CONCLUSION

we notice that an increasing production on prevention in the men who have sex with men segment results from the emergence of multiple preventive methods and strategies and their combined actions beyond the star role of condoms.

Для цитирования: Mathias Augusto, Alves Dos Santos Lorruan, Grangeiro Alexandre, Couto Marcia Thereza. Thematic synthesis HIV prevention qualitative studies in men who have sex with men (MSM).. Colombia medica (Cali, Colombia). 2019. DOI: 10.25100/cm.v50i3.4078.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.