Repairable ex vivo model of functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Transcatheter mitral valve repair is an emerging alternative to the surgical repair. This technology requires preclinical studies to assess efficacy in mitigating mitral regurgitation (MR). However, ex vivo MR models are not established. We developed 2 novel repairable models, functional and degenerative, which can quantitatively assess regurgitation and effect of intervention.
METHODS
We used porcine mitral valves and a pulsatile flow circulation system. In the functional MR model, the annulus was immersed in 0.1% collagenase solution and dilated using 3D-printed dilators. To control the regurgitation grade, the sizes of the dilator and silicone sheet in which the valve was sutured to were adjusted. Chordae of P2 were severed in the degenerative model, and the number of severed chordae was adjusted to control the regurgitation grade. Models were repaired using the edge-to-edge or artificial chordae technique.
RESULTS
The mean regurgitant fraction of the moderate-severe functional and degenerative models were 47.9% [standard deviation (SD): 2.2%] and 58.5% (SD: 8.0%), which were significantly reduced to 28.7% (SD: 4.4%) (P < 0.001) and 26.0% (SD: 4.4%) (P < 0.001) after the valve repair procedures. Severe functional model had a mean regurgitant fraction of 59.4% (SD: 6.0%).
CONCLUSIONS
Both functional and degenerative models could produce sufficient MR levels that meet the interventional indication criteria. The repairable models are valuable in evaluating the efficacy of valve repair procedures and devices. The ability to control the amount of regurgitation enhances the versatility and reliability of these models. These reproducible models could expedite the development of novel devices.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.