MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/03000605221132027

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2022

Quality of life after trigeminal nerve block in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective cohort study and literature review.

Jacques Nicolas, Karoutsos Simon, Marais Loïc, Nathan-Denizot Nathalie

ОбзорСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of trigeminal nerve block (TNB) on patients' quality of life (QOL) 15 days after the procedure in patients with refractory TN.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study involved patients receiving TNB (levobupivacaine, clonidine, corticosteroid) between 2014 and 2018 at a postoperative pain clinic in France. Change in QOL from Day 0 (before block) to Day 15 was assessed according to SF-12.

RESULTS

21 patients (62 ± 14 y) were included in the study. Most patients (71%) were referred following surgery or dentistry. Of the 9 patients (43%) who exhibited >10% increase in SF-12 scores and so were deemed responders, SF12-physical and SF12-mental were increased by mean differences of 17 and 9 points, respectively. The mean duration of block lasted 15 ± 59 days (range 1 to 90 days) and no severe adverse effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Improved QOL was observed in approximately 50% of patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) two weeks after specific nerve block. The technique was easy to administer and well accepted by the patients.

Для цитирования: Jacques Nicolas, Karoutsos Simon, Marais Loïc, Nathan-Denizot Nathalie. Quality of life after trigeminal nerve block in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: A retrospective cohort study and literature review.. The Journal of international medical research. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/03000605221132027.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.