Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2022
Utilization of Our Toolkit: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Surgical Therapies in Vitiligo Treatment.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
McCrary Myles R, Gibbs David C, Alharthi Maher, Krueger Loren D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Although vitiligo is often treated medically, there is increasing evidence for surgical therapies. Overlap with in-office surgical therapies that are already employed for other dermatologic conditions suggest that there is a significant opportunity to expand dermatologists' therapeutic repertoire for vitiligo.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy of nonphototherapy surgical treatments for vitiligo in comparative or placebo-controlled trials.
METHODS: A systematic review for surgical treatments for vitiligo was conducted. Primary outcomes were treatment success (>75% repigmentation) and failure (<25% repigmentation) for which meta-analyses were performed. Adverse effects were noted. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality.
RESULTS: Surgical treatments reviewed included platelet-rich plasma, microneedling, ablative therapies, and surgical modalities. Seventy-three studies with 2,911 patients were included. The repigmentation benefits and adverse events are summarized. Meta-analyses suggest benefits for ablative laser therapies or microneedling in combination with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and for suction blister epidermal grafting over punch grafting.
CONCLUSION: The addition of microneedling or ablative laser therapy to NB-UVB phototherapy may improve repigmentation with minimal adverse effects. Surgical therapies, such as suction blister grafting and punch grafting, may offer the highest likelihood of repigmentation but have a risk of adverse effects including scarring and hyperpigmentation.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy of nonphototherapy surgical treatments for vitiligo in comparative or placebo-controlled trials.
METHODS: A systematic review for surgical treatments for vitiligo was conducted. Primary outcomes were treatment success (>75% repigmentation) and failure (<25% repigmentation) for which meta-analyses were performed. Adverse effects were noted. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess study quality.
RESULTS: Surgical treatments reviewed included platelet-rich plasma, microneedling, ablative therapies, and surgical modalities. Seventy-three studies with 2,911 patients were included. The repigmentation benefits and adverse events are summarized. Meta-analyses suggest benefits for ablative laser therapies or microneedling in combination with narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and for suction blister epidermal grafting over punch grafting.
CONCLUSION: The addition of microneedling or ablative laser therapy to NB-UVB phototherapy may improve repigmentation with minimal adverse effects. Surgical therapies, such as suction blister grafting and punch grafting, may offer the highest likelihood of repigmentation but have a risk of adverse effects including scarring and hyperpigmentation.