MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/opx.0b013e3181baac1a

Медицинская библиотека · Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2009

Treatment of primary pterygium.

Ozkurt Yelda B, Kocams Ozkan, Comez Arzu Taskiran, Uslu Burcu, Dogan Omer K

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To compare preserved human amniotic membrane transplantation and conjunctival autografts for treatment of primary pterygium.

METHODS

Thirty-seven eyes of 35 patients with primary pterygium underwent surgical excision. In group A, 25 eyes were treated with conjunctival autografts. In group B, 12 eyes were treated with preserved human amniotic membrane transplantation. These two groups were compared in terms of complications, recurrence, and final appearance, prospectively.

RESULTS

We observed two cases of recurrence in group A and five cases of recurrence in group B. The onset of recurrence was about 5.5 months in both groups. We observed two eyes with Dellen ulcer and one case with a Tenon's cyst in the superior temporal quadrant in group A and one case of Dellen ulcer and granulation tissue of one eye in group B.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that free conjunctival autografting is a more effective technique in primary pterygium in terms of lowering recurrences compared with the amniotic membrane transplantation technique.

Для цитирования: Ozkurt Yelda B, Kocams Ozkan, Comez Arzu Taskiran, Uslu Burcu, Dogan Omer K. Treatment of primary pterygium.. Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry. 2009. DOI: 10.1097/opx.0b013e3181baac1a.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.