Coronary artery disease · 2024
Comparison of clinical outcomes in patients with mixed angina and pure vasospastic angina.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Song Zhao Yan, Kim Moo Hyun, Lee Kwang Min
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated differences in clinical outcomes between mixed angina (MA) and pure vasospastic angina (PVA).
METHODS: A total of 524 vasospastic angina patients who did or did not have >50% coronary artery stenosis from January 2005 to January 2021 were divided into two groups (Group 1: PVA, N = 399; Group 2: MA, N = 125) and then three groups [Group 1: PVA, N = 399; Group 2: MA without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), N = 67; Group 3: MA with PCI, N = 58] for assessment. We recorded the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: the composite of death, myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or rehospitalization) during 3-year clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Compared to the PVA group, there were significant differences in MACCE (20.8% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.011) and rehospitalization (20.0% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.002) in the MA group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the MA with PCI group had the highest cumulative incidence rate of MACCE during the 3-year follow-up (log-rank P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Compared with the PVA patients, MA patients had significantly worse clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up.
METHODS: A total of 524 vasospastic angina patients who did or did not have >50% coronary artery stenosis from January 2005 to January 2021 were divided into two groups (Group 1: PVA, N = 399; Group 2: MA, N = 125) and then three groups [Group 1: PVA, N = 399; Group 2: MA without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), N = 67; Group 3: MA with PCI, N = 58] for assessment. We recorded the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: the composite of death, myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke or rehospitalization) during 3-year clinical follow-up.
RESULTS: Compared to the PVA group, there were significant differences in MACCE (20.8% vs. 11.8%, P = 0.011) and rehospitalization (20.0% vs. 9.8%, P = 0.002) in the MA group. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the MA with PCI group had the highest cumulative incidence rate of MACCE during the 3-year follow-up (log-rank P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Compared with the PVA patients, MA patients had significantly worse clinical outcomes during long-term follow-up.