JACC. Asia · 2023
Association of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease With Risk of HF and AF.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohno Ryusei, Kaneko Hidehiro, Suzuki Yuta, Okada Akira, Matsuoka Satoshi, Ueno Kensuke, Fujiu Katsuhito, Michihata Nobuaki, Jo Taisuke, Takeda Norifumi, Morita Hiroyuki, Node Koichi, Yasunaga Hideo, Komuro Issei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a novel concept of hepatic disease. Although the prevalences of heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasing worldwide, limited data have assessed the extent to which MAFLD is associated with incident HF and AF.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to examine the association of MAFLD with incident HF and AF.
METHODS: Analyses were conducted using a nationwide epidemiologic database including 3,279,918 individuals (median age 45 years; 57.6% men). Metabolic dysfunction was defined as 1 or more of the following: overweight (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2), metabolic syndrome, or diabetes mellitus. FLD was defined as fatty liver index of >30. MAFLD was defined as the coexistence of metabolic dysfunction and FLD. We categorized study participants into 4 groups: non-FLD/nonmetabolic dysfunction (n = 1,709,116), metabolic dysfunction (n = 584,483), FLD (n = 89,497), and MAFLD (n = 896,822). The primary outcomes were HF and AF.
RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of 1,160 ± 905 days, 62,746 incident HF events and 15,408 incident AF events were recorded. Compared with the non-FLD/non-metabolic dysfunction group, HRs for HF and AF, respectively, were 1.20 (95% CI: 1.18-1.23) and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19) for metabolic dysfunction, 1.24 (95% CI: 1.19-1.30) and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.23) for FLD, and 1.73 (95% CI: 1.69-1.76) and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.46-1.57) for MAFLD. MAFLD was also associated with a higher risk of developing myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke. A risk of developing cardiovascular events differed between MAFLD subtypes (Wald test P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD was associated with a greater risk of developing HF and AF, suggesting the clinical importance of this novel hepatic disease concept.
OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to examine the association of MAFLD with incident HF and AF.
METHODS: Analyses were conducted using a nationwide epidemiologic database including 3,279,918 individuals (median age 45 years; 57.6% men). Metabolic dysfunction was defined as 1 or more of the following: overweight (body mass index ≥23 kg/m2), metabolic syndrome, or diabetes mellitus. FLD was defined as fatty liver index of >30. MAFLD was defined as the coexistence of metabolic dysfunction and FLD. We categorized study participants into 4 groups: non-FLD/nonmetabolic dysfunction (n = 1,709,116), metabolic dysfunction (n = 584,483), FLD (n = 89,497), and MAFLD (n = 896,822). The primary outcomes were HF and AF.
RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up period of 1,160 ± 905 days, 62,746 incident HF events and 15,408 incident AF events were recorded. Compared with the non-FLD/non-metabolic dysfunction group, HRs for HF and AF, respectively, were 1.20 (95% CI: 1.18-1.23) and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.08-1.19) for metabolic dysfunction, 1.24 (95% CI: 1.19-1.30) and 1.13 (95% CI: 1.04-1.23) for FLD, and 1.73 (95% CI: 1.69-1.76) and 1.51 (95% CI: 1.46-1.57) for MAFLD. MAFLD was also associated with a higher risk of developing myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke. A risk of developing cardiovascular events differed between MAFLD subtypes (Wald test P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD was associated with a greater risk of developing HF and AF, suggesting the clinical importance of this novel hepatic disease concept.