MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013657

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2023

Characterizing Mechanisms of Ischemia in Patients With Myocardial Bridges.

Sinha Aish, Rahman Haseeb, Rajani Ronak, Demir Ozan M, Li KamWa Matthew, Morgan Holly, Ezad Saad M, Ellis Howard, Hogan Dexter, Gulati Ankur, Shah Ajay M, Chiribiri Amedeo, Webb Andrew J, Marber Michael, Perera Divaka

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Myocardial bridges (MBs) are prevalent and can be associated with acute and chronic ischemic syndromes. We sought to determine the substrates for ischemia in patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries and a MB in the left anterior descending artery.

METHODS

Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries underwent the acquisition of intracoronary pressure and flow during rest, supine bicycle exercise, and adenosine infusion. Coronary wave intensity analysis was performed, with perfusion efficiency defined as accelerating wave energy/total wave energy (%). Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was defined as a reduction in epicardial vessel diameter ≥20% in response to intracoronary acetylcholine infusion. Patients with angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries and a MB were compared with 2 angina with nonobstructive coronary arteries groups with no MB: 1 with coronary microvascular disease (CMD: coronary flow reserve, <2.5) and 1 with normal coronary flow reserve (reference: coronary flow reserve, ≥2.5).

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were enrolled in the study (30 MB, 33 CMD, and 29 reference). Fractional flow reserve in these 3 groups was 0.86±0.05, 0.92±0.04, and 0.94±0.05; coronary flow reserve was 2.5±0.5, 2.0±0.3, and 3.2±0.6. Perfusion efficiency increased numerically during exercise in the reference group (65±9%-69±13%; P=0.063) but decreased in the CMD (68±10%-50±10%; P<0.001) and MB (66±9%-55±9%; P<0.001) groups. The reduction in perfusion efficiency had distinct causes: in CMD, this was driven by microcirculation-derived energy in early diastole, whereas in MB, this was driven by diminished accelerating wave energy, due to the upstream bridge, in early systole. Epicardial endothelial dysfunction was more common in the MB group (54% versus 29% reference and 38% CMD). Overall, 93% of patients with a MB had an identifiable ischemic substrate.

CONCLUSIONS

MBs led to impaired coronary perfusion efficiency during exercise, which was due to diminished accelerating wave energy in early systole compared with the reference group. Additionally, there was a high prevalence of endothelial and microvascular dysfunction. These ischemic mechanisms may represent distinct treatment targets.

Для цитирования: Sinha Aish, Rahman Haseeb, Rajani Ronak, Demir Ozan M, Li KamWa Matthew, Morgan Holly, Ezad Saad M, Ellis Howard, Hogan Dexter, Gulati Ankur, Shah Ajay M, Chiribiri Amedeo, Webb Andrew J, Marber Michael, Perera Divaka. Characterizing Mechanisms of Ischemia in Patients With Myocardial Bridges.. Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. 2023. DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.123.013657.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.