Potentially Causal Associations Between Extensive Gastric Atrophy and Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in Japan.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
A potential association between esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric atrophy (GA) has been reported. However, most published studies have used case-control designs, leading to selection bias. This study aimed to investigate the causal association between ESCC and GA using a nationwide cohort.
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was conducted on consecutive participants who underwent endoscopy at 17 health check-up institutes in Japan between 2013 and 2017, with at least one follow-up endoscopy by December 2022. GA was evaluated endoscopically and classified into atrophy-free, closed-type, and open-type GA. The association between ESCC incidence and GA was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.
RESULTS
Among 33,461 participants, 17,398 (52.0%), 8257 (24.7%), and 7804 (23.3%) were classified into atrophy-free, closed-type GA, and open-type GA, respectively. Seventy-seven ESCCs were identified during a median 6-year follow-up period. The incidence of ESCC was 24 cases (0.024%/year) in the atrophy-free group, 15 cases (0.031%/year) in the closed-type GA group, and 38 cases (0.089%/year) in the open-type GA group, with a significantly higher incidence observed in the open-type GA group (p < 0.001). After adjusting for established risk factors (e.g., age, sex, drinking, and smoking), open-type GA, but not closed-type GA, was an independent risk factor for ESCC (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.58-4.69).
CONCLUSIONS
This Japanese nationwide cohort study provides new evidence suggesting a causal association between extensive GA and the subsequent development of ESCC.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.