Helicobacter · 2025
Evaluation of Pepsinogen I, II, Gastrin 17 and Helicobacter pylori IgG in Atrophic Gastritis: A Head-To-Head Comparison of Lateral Flow and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Xiang Luochengling, Zhou Ying, Guo Xiaopei, Mommersteeg Michiel C, Nieuwenburg Stella A V, Peppelenbosch Maikel P, Spaander Manon C W, Fuhler Gwenny M
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A lateral flow assay (LFA) incorporating several biomarkers, including pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), Gastrin-17 (G-17), and Helicobacter pylori IgG, enables the rapid non-invasive detection of atrophic gastritis (AG). However, its diagnostic performance compared to conventional enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has not been established.
METHODS: This head-to-head comparison study included participants from a prospective and multicenter cohort. Patients with gastric premalignant lesions underwent endoscopy, and fasting serum samples were collected for biomarker analysis using both LFA and ELISA.
RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included in this study. LFA demonstrated diagnostic specificity for AG comparable to ELISA, with specificity rates of 95.74% (95% CI [85.75%-99.24%]) for LFA and 100.00% (95% CI [92.44%-100.00%]) for ELISA (p = 0.49). Both methods showed similar performance in detecting H. pylori infection, with an AUC of 0.754 (95% CI [0.616-0.891]) for LFA and 0.778 (95% CI [0.633-0.922]) for ELISA (p = 0.70). For identifying autoimmune gastritis in corpus AG, a reduced PGI/PGII ratio combined with elevated G-17 levels provided excellent discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI [0.870-0.926]) for LFA and 0.924 (95% CI [0.861-0.924]) for ELISA.
CONCLUSION: The LFA assay is a feasible, rapid, and non-invasive tool for assessing gastric functional mucosa. Its diagnostic performance for detecting AG is comparable to ELISA, making it a supplementary tool in point-of-care settings to improve the early detection of AG.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was not registered as a clinical trial, as it is based on an observational study, Progression and Regression of precancerous Gastric Lesions (PROREGAL) study.
METHODS: This head-to-head comparison study included participants from a prospective and multicenter cohort. Patients with gastric premalignant lesions underwent endoscopy, and fasting serum samples were collected for biomarker analysis using both LFA and ELISA.
RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included in this study. LFA demonstrated diagnostic specificity for AG comparable to ELISA, with specificity rates of 95.74% (95% CI [85.75%-99.24%]) for LFA and 100.00% (95% CI [92.44%-100.00%]) for ELISA (p = 0.49). Both methods showed similar performance in detecting H. pylori infection, with an AUC of 0.754 (95% CI [0.616-0.891]) for LFA and 0.778 (95% CI [0.633-0.922]) for ELISA (p = 0.70). For identifying autoimmune gastritis in corpus AG, a reduced PGI/PGII ratio combined with elevated G-17 levels provided excellent discrimination, achieving an AUC of 0.926 (95% CI [0.870-0.926]) for LFA and 0.924 (95% CI [0.861-0.924]) for ELISA.
CONCLUSION: The LFA assay is a feasible, rapid, and non-invasive tool for assessing gastric functional mucosa. Its diagnostic performance for detecting AG is comparable to ELISA, making it a supplementary tool in point-of-care settings to improve the early detection of AG.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was not registered as a clinical trial, as it is based on an observational study, Progression and Regression of precancerous Gastric Lesions (PROREGAL) study.