MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00645-9

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2003

LVAD bloodstream infections: therapeutic rationale for transplantation after LVAD infection.

Poston Robert S, Husain Shahid, Sorce Damian, Stanford Ellieen, Kusne Shimon, Wagener Margaret, Griffith Bartley P, Kormos Robert L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Patients who have ventricular assist devices (VADs) and experience bloodstream infection (BSI) have high mortality. We addressed 2 questions raised by the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) priority policy for this problem: 1) Are organs wasted on this ultra-high-risk group? 2) Can device-related BSI be differentiated from transient BSI?

METHODS

Patients with VADs who underwent heart transplantation from 1987 to 2001, who had BSI during VAD support, and who had positive cultures at VAD explant (device-related BSI, n = 10) were compared with those with negative cultures at explant (non-device-related BSI, n = 11).

RESULTS

Patients with device-related BSI had an 80% (8/10) rate of persistent bacteremia; 30 days and 1 year after transplantation, mortality was 14% and 26%, respectively. Non-device-related BSI (n = 11) persisted in 18% (2/11); peri-operative and 1-year mortalities were 9% and 13%. Duration of VAD support predicted infection (132 vs 48 days, p < 0.001); hypo-albuminemia (2.9 +/- 0.5 mg/dl vs 3.3 +/- 0.8 mg/dl, p < 0.05), and a resistant organism predicted a device-related BSI. These patients had increased intubation requirements and had increased creatinine concentration during the first post-operative week, with no difference in liver function, blood loss, transfusions (packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, or platelets), or hemodynamic stability vs patients with non-device BSI. Despite decreased immunosuppression, we found no difference in acute rejection events with device-related BSI. Re-infection with the pre-operative organism occurred in only 1 patient per group.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that urgent (Status 1A) cardiac transplantation is effective in stable patients with device-related BSI, and these data support the current UNOS policy. However, an extra-device source of BSI should be excluded by considering the isolated organism, the baseline nutritional status, and other risk factors.

Для цитирования: Poston Robert S, Husain Shahid, Sorce Damian, Stanford Ellieen, Kusne Shimon, Wagener Margaret, Griffith Bartley P, Kormos Robert L. LVAD bloodstream infections: therapeutic rationale for transplantation after LVAD infection.. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2003. DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(02)00645-9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.