MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1067/mhl.2001.116135

Медицинская библиотека · Heart & lung : the journal of critical care · 2001

Use of complementary therapies, adherence, and quality of life in lung transplant recipients.

Matthees B J, Anantachoti P, Kreitzer M J, Savik K, Hertz M I, Gross C R

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to describe complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by lung transplant patients and to determine whether CAM users differ from nonusers with respect to health status, quality of life, or medical adherence.

METHODS

A mailed survey seeking CAM, quality of life, and adherence information was sent to 145 lung transplant recipients, and 99 responded.

RESULTS

The majority (88%) used at least 1 form of CAM (median, 2; range, 0-17). Prayer (68%), support groups (43%), and relaxation techniques (31%) were the most common. Only 44% of users reported discussing CAM with their providers. CAM users were adherent to their transplant regimen. Few differences were found between CAM users and nonusers. Education, high symptom burden, female sex, and depression symptoms were associated with various types of CAM use.

CONCLUSION

Most lung transplant recipients are using CAM. Providers must explore potential for interaction or enhancement between CAM and standard therapy to optimize care.

Для цитирования: Matthees B J, Anantachoti P, Kreitzer M J, Savik K, Hertz M I, Gross C R. Use of complementary therapies, adherence, and quality of life in lung transplant recipients.. Heart & lung : the journal of critical care. 2001. DOI: 10.1067/mhl.2001.116135.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.