Optometry (St. Louis, Mo.) · 2005
A retrospective study on presbyopia onset and progression in a Hispanic population.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carnevali Tony, Southaphanh Pinhkeo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study evaluates differences in age and presbyopia progression between an ethnic Hispanic and a non-Hispanic patient population.
METHODS: Patient records from the Optometric Center of Los Angeles were examined retrospectively from 1998 through 2001. The first part of the study compared ages at onset and progression of presbyopia as a function of ethnicity. The second part of the study compared the amplitude of accommodation for the cohort of patients to Hofstetter's expected norms.
RESULTS: A total of 332 patient records were evaluated: 61% (n = 203) Hispanic and 39% (n = 129) non-Hispanic. For an add power of +0.75 D, presbyopia developed in the reviewed Hispanic population at 39.31 years of age in comparison to development in non-Hispanics at 40.22 years. Hispanics also had a similar progression of reading add power (0.105 D/year) as compared to non-Hispanics (0.097 D/year) (t= 0.798, p = 0.43). The progression of amplitude of accommodation for the Hispanic (amplitude = 11.2 - 0.132 x age) and non-Hispanic populations (amplitude = 9.72 - 0.18 x age) (t= 0.0997, p = 0.92) were comparable, but both groups show a slower decline of amplitude when compared to Hofstetter's norms (p< 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in the age at onset and progression of presbyopia was found between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients; however, both groups of patients have a later onset and slower progression of presbyopia when compared to Hofstetter's norms.
METHODS: Patient records from the Optometric Center of Los Angeles were examined retrospectively from 1998 through 2001. The first part of the study compared ages at onset and progression of presbyopia as a function of ethnicity. The second part of the study compared the amplitude of accommodation for the cohort of patients to Hofstetter's expected norms.
RESULTS: A total of 332 patient records were evaluated: 61% (n = 203) Hispanic and 39% (n = 129) non-Hispanic. For an add power of +0.75 D, presbyopia developed in the reviewed Hispanic population at 39.31 years of age in comparison to development in non-Hispanics at 40.22 years. Hispanics also had a similar progression of reading add power (0.105 D/year) as compared to non-Hispanics (0.097 D/year) (t= 0.798, p = 0.43). The progression of amplitude of accommodation for the Hispanic (amplitude = 11.2 - 0.132 x age) and non-Hispanic populations (amplitude = 9.72 - 0.18 x age) (t= 0.0997, p = 0.92) were comparable, but both groups show a slower decline of amplitude when compared to Hofstetter's norms (p< 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant difference in the age at onset and progression of presbyopia was found between Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients; however, both groups of patients have a later onset and slower progression of presbyopia when compared to Hofstetter's norms.