The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 1996
Donor-derived human leukocyte antigen class I proteins in the serum of heart transplant recipients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
DeVito-Haynes L D, Jankowska-Gan E, Heisey D, Jutte N H, Balk A H, Weimar W, Claas F H, Warner T F, Mentzer R M, Love R B, Burlingham W J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen class I proteins are expressed on most cell types in all organ allografts but are constitutively secreted only by certain organs, for example, the liver. We hypothesized that detectable levels of donor-derived human leukocyte antigen proteins would be released from transplanted cardiac allografts only when the allograft was immunologically stimulated, that is, during rejection and perhaps during viral infection. If so, then the release of donor human leukocyte antigen might be a noninvasive monitor of these events.
METHODS: We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect donor-derived human leukocyte antigen-A2 in the serum of 21 human leukocyte antigen-A2 negative recipients of human leukocyte antigen-A2-positive heart transplants. The level of donor human leukocyte antigen-A2 during the first 100 days after transplantation was correlated with the clinical status of the patient.
RESULTS: We found little or no donor human leukocyte antigen in the serum of heart transplant recipients whose postoperative clinical course was unremarkable for infection or rejection. We did find donor-derived human leukocyte antigen in the serum of heart transplant recipients transiently in the week immediately after transplantation, continuously from patients in whom chronic rejection was developing, during cytomegalovirus infection, and during some, but not all, acute rejection episodes as determined by endomyocardial biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the donor human leukocyte antigen serum level reflects vascular diseases, rather than myocardial disease in the transplanted heart. Therefore, the serum level of donor human leukocyte antigen cannot be used as a monitor of cellular infiltration and myocyte damage as currently assessed by endomyocardial biopsy but may be an early indicator of the development of vascular disease such as chronic rejection.
METHODS: We used an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect donor-derived human leukocyte antigen-A2 in the serum of 21 human leukocyte antigen-A2 negative recipients of human leukocyte antigen-A2-positive heart transplants. The level of donor human leukocyte antigen-A2 during the first 100 days after transplantation was correlated with the clinical status of the patient.
RESULTS: We found little or no donor human leukocyte antigen in the serum of heart transplant recipients whose postoperative clinical course was unremarkable for infection or rejection. We did find donor-derived human leukocyte antigen in the serum of heart transplant recipients transiently in the week immediately after transplantation, continuously from patients in whom chronic rejection was developing, during cytomegalovirus infection, and during some, but not all, acute rejection episodes as determined by endomyocardial biopsy.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the donor human leukocyte antigen serum level reflects vascular diseases, rather than myocardial disease in the transplanted heart. Therefore, the serum level of donor human leukocyte antigen cannot be used as a monitor of cellular infiltration and myocyte damage as currently assessed by endomyocardial biopsy but may be an early indicator of the development of vascular disease such as chronic rejection.