MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Optometric Association · 1997

OPTX 20/20 and Press-On Optics bifocal segments: an evaluation.

Bell S M, Gurholt K J, Yolton R L, Griffith W T

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

OPTX 20/20 and Press-On Optics removable bifocal segments were evaluated in three areas: optical quality, effects on vision, and stability under simulated environmental conditions.

METHODS

To evaluate optical quality, sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent powers were measured in center and peripheral portions of 10 segments, with powers ranging from +1.00 to +2.50 D.

RESULTS

Twelve of 20 OPTX 20/20 segments and six of 20 Press-On Optics +1.00 and +1.50 D segments failed to pass ANSI Z80.1 standards because of unwanted cylinder powers. With regard to vision, +2.00 D OPTX 20/20 segments provided a 1 Snellen line advantage in near acuity, as compared with the Press-On Optics segments. contrast sensitivity for low- and mid-spatial frequencies was not significantly different for segments of the two types.

CONCLUSION

For higher powers, the optical characteristics of the OPTX 20/20 segments are better and provide better visual acuity. For lower powers, distortion and small amounts of unwanted cylinder reduce the optical quality of the OPTX 20/20 segments. Both segment types retained adhesion to CR-39 carriers equally well and should be satisfactory for their designated purposes of providing temporary and removable adds for occasional use.

Для цитирования: Bell S M, Gurholt K J, Yolton R L, Griffith W T. OPTX 20/20 and Press-On Optics bifocal segments: an evaluation.. Journal of the American Optometric Association. 1997.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.