Journal of the American Optometric Association · 1995
Lined multifocal wearers prefer progressive addition lenses.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boroyan H J, Cho M H, Fuller B C, Krefman R A, McDougall J H, Schaeffer J L, Tahran R L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite reported successes with progressive addition lenses, lined multifocals remain the lens of choice for previous lined multifocal wearers.
METHODS: To explore the feasibility of switching lined multifocal wearers to PALs, in a prospective clinical trial we interviewed 265 lined multifocal wearers, prescribed a new PAL (Varilux Comfort) and then interviewed them again to compare the lens types and patient preferences.
RESULTS: PALs ranked significantly higher than lined multifocals for all questions and were preferred by 92 percent of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PALs should be the lens of choice for previous bifocal wearers.
METHODS: To explore the feasibility of switching lined multifocal wearers to PALs, in a prospective clinical trial we interviewed 265 lined multifocal wearers, prescribed a new PAL (Varilux Comfort) and then interviewed them again to compare the lens types and patient preferences.
RESULTS: PALs ranked significantly higher than lined multifocals for all questions and were preferred by 92 percent of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: PALs should be the lens of choice for previous bifocal wearers.