Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography · 2025
Roadmap analysis for coronary artery stenosis detection and percutaneous coronary intervention prediction in cardiac CT for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fujito Hidesato, Jilaihawi Hasan, Han Donghee, Gransar Heidi, Hashimoto Hidenobu, Cho Sung Woo, Lee Sunam, Gheyath Bashaer, Park Rebekah H, Patel Dhairya, Guo Yuchao, Kwan Alan C, Hayes Sean W, Thomson Louise E J, Slomka Piotr J, Dey Damini, Makkar Raj, Friedman John D, Berman Daniel S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The new artificial intelligence-based software, Roadmap (HeartFlow), may assist in evaluating coronary artery stenosis during cardiac computed tomography (CT) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
METHODS: Consecutive TAVR candidates who underwent both cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography were enrolled. We evaluated the ability of three methods to predict obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as ≥50 % stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), and the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within one year: Roadmap, clinician CT specialists with Roadmap, and CT specialists alone.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting QCA ≥50 % stenosis was similar for CT specialists with or without Roadmap (0.93 [0.85-0.97] vs. 0.94 [0.88-0.98], p = 0.82), both significantly higher than Roadmap alone (all p < 0.05). For PCI prediction, no significant differences were found between QCA and CT specialists, with or without Roadmap, while Roadmap's AUC was lower (all p < 0.05). The negative predictive value (NPV) of CT specialists with Roadmap for ≥50 % stenosis was 97 %, and for PCI prediction, the NPV was comparable to QCA (p = 1.00). In contrast, the positive predictive value (PPV) of Roadmap alone for ≥50 % stenosis was 49 %, the lowest among all approaches, with a similar trend observed for PCI prediction.
CONCLUSIONS: While Roadmap alone is insufficient for clinical decision-making due to low PPV, Roadmap may serve as a "second observer", providing a supportive tool for CT specialists by flagging lesions for careful review, thereby enhancing workflow efficiency and maintaining high diagnostic accuracy with excellent NPV.
METHODS: Consecutive TAVR candidates who underwent both cardiac CT angiography (CTA) and invasive coronary angiography were enrolled. We evaluated the ability of three methods to predict obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as ≥50 % stenosis on quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), and the need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within one year: Roadmap, clinician CT specialists with Roadmap, and CT specialists alone.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) for predicting QCA ≥50 % stenosis was similar for CT specialists with or without Roadmap (0.93 [0.85-0.97] vs. 0.94 [0.88-0.98], p = 0.82), both significantly higher than Roadmap alone (all p < 0.05). For PCI prediction, no significant differences were found between QCA and CT specialists, with or without Roadmap, while Roadmap's AUC was lower (all p < 0.05). The negative predictive value (NPV) of CT specialists with Roadmap for ≥50 % stenosis was 97 %, and for PCI prediction, the NPV was comparable to QCA (p = 1.00). In contrast, the positive predictive value (PPV) of Roadmap alone for ≥50 % stenosis was 49 %, the lowest among all approaches, with a similar trend observed for PCI prediction.
CONCLUSIONS: While Roadmap alone is insufficient for clinical decision-making due to low PPV, Roadmap may serve as a "second observer", providing a supportive tool for CT specialists by flagging lesions for careful review, thereby enhancing workflow efficiency and maintaining high diagnostic accuracy with excellent NPV.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementPredictive Value of TestsMaleFemaleCoronary StenosisComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyAgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionAged, 80 and overSeverity of Illness IndexAortic Valve StenosisRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsTreatment OutcomeClinical Decision-MakingMultidetector Computed TomographySoftwareArtificial IntelligenceDecision Support Techniques