Indian heart journal · 2025
Unilateral access versus bilateral access in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jain Hritvik, Shahabi Mariam, Shafiq Aimen, Agrawal Siddharth P, Saad Marwan S, Sharaf Barry L, Gordon Paul C, Abbott J Dawn, Vallabhajosyula Saraschandra
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures frequently require a second arterial access to perform aortic root angiography. In recent times, there has been an increase in the use of unilateral access, however, the outcomes data are conflicting.
METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted to retrieve studies comparing unilateral to bilateral access in TAVR. Risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Outcomes of interest included minor vascular complications, major vascular complications, 30-day stroke, and 30-day all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 2,181 patients undergoing TAVR (unilateral 368, bilateral 1813) were included in this meta-analysis. Unilateral access was comparable to bilateral access for minor vascular complications (RR: 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.48-1.62), major vascular complications (RR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.14-2.75), stroke (RR: 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.42, 2.17) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.04, 6.93).
CONCLUSION: Unilateral access for TAVR was associated with similar short-term outcomes and safety profiles compared to bilateral access for TAVR.
METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted to retrieve studies comparing unilateral to bilateral access in TAVR. Risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Outcomes of interest included minor vascular complications, major vascular complications, 30-day stroke, and 30-day all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Three studies with a total of 2,181 patients undergoing TAVR (unilateral 368, bilateral 1813) were included in this meta-analysis. Unilateral access was comparable to bilateral access for minor vascular complications (RR: 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.48-1.62), major vascular complications (RR: 0.61, 95 % CI: 0.14-2.75), stroke (RR: 0.95; 95 % CI: 0.42, 2.17) and all-cause mortality (RR: 0.52; 95 % CI: 0.04, 6.93).
CONCLUSION: Unilateral access for TAVR was associated with similar short-term outcomes and safety profiles compared to bilateral access for TAVR.