Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2016
Outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy instead of phototherapeutic keratectomy for patients with granular corneal dystrophy type 2.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oya Fumika, Soma Takeshi, Oie Yoshinori, Nakao Takeshi, Koh Shizuka, Tsujikawa Motokazu, Maeda Naoyuki, Nishida Kohji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate visual function and postoperative refractive errors in patients with granular corneal dystrophy type 2 (GCD2) and cataracts who underwent photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) instead of phototherapeutic keratectomy (PTK) following cataract surgery to avoid PTK-induced central island formation and reduce refractive errors after cataract surgery.
METHODS: The medical records of 14 eyes from nine patients (one man and eight women; mean age, 69.0 ± 8.5 years) with GCD2 and cataracts were evaluated. All patients underwent PTK using the PRK mode 3 months after cataract surgery. We analyzed corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive errors, and corneal astigmatism derived from Fourier analysis and assessed the incidence of complications in cataract surgery and PTK.
RESULTS: The mean CDVA logMAR values were 0.42 ± 0.19, 0.38 ± 0.18, and 0.16 ± 0.12 before and after cataract surgery and after PTK, respectively. CDVA improved significantly after PTK, as compared with both before and after cataract surgery (P < 0.001). The mean absolute errors after cataract surgery and PTK were 0.53 ± 0.43 and 1.61 ± 1.01 diopters, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Fourier indices did not significantly vary in the 3-mm diameter zone, and only the asymmetry component of the 6-mm diameter zone significantly (P <0.01) increased postoperatively. No central island formation and no other marked complications were observed postoperatively in any case.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing PTK using the PRK mode following cataract surgery may be effective for patients with GCD2 and cataracts.
METHODS: The medical records of 14 eyes from nine patients (one man and eight women; mean age, 69.0 ± 8.5 years) with GCD2 and cataracts were evaluated. All patients underwent PTK using the PRK mode 3 months after cataract surgery. We analyzed corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refractive errors, and corneal astigmatism derived from Fourier analysis and assessed the incidence of complications in cataract surgery and PTK.
RESULTS: The mean CDVA logMAR values were 0.42 ± 0.19, 0.38 ± 0.18, and 0.16 ± 0.12 before and after cataract surgery and after PTK, respectively. CDVA improved significantly after PTK, as compared with both before and after cataract surgery (P < 0.001). The mean absolute errors after cataract surgery and PTK were 0.53 ± 0.43 and 1.61 ± 1.01 diopters, respectively. Pre- and postoperative Fourier indices did not significantly vary in the 3-mm diameter zone, and only the asymmetry component of the 6-mm diameter zone significantly (P <0.01) increased postoperatively. No central island formation and no other marked complications were observed postoperatively in any case.
CONCLUSIONS: Performing PTK using the PRK mode following cataract surgery may be effective for patients with GCD2 and cataracts.