Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 2015
Screening Patients With Cataract for Premium IOL Candidacy Using Microperimetry.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Klyce Stephen D, McDonald Marguerite B, Morales Marco U
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To explore the use of microperimetry in the evaluation of macular dysfunction in patients with cataract, to aid in proper intraocular lens selection (multifocal vs monofocal), and to set expectations for postoperative visual function.
METHODS: One randomly chosen eye of 10 patients diagnosed as having mild (1+) to moderate (3+) cataract was evaluated before and 1 week after cataract surgery with the MAIA microperimeter (Centervue S.p.A, Padova, Italy). Corrected distance visual acuity, dilated and undilated biomicroscopy and indirect fundus examinations, intraocular pressure measurement, and a MAIA microperimeter test to measure macular sensitivity and fixation pattern were also performed.
RESULTS: Two patients showed macular abnormalities before and after surgery that were noted on MAIA testing: one patient showed reduced average threshold sensitivity and abnormal percent reduced threshold, whereas the other patient showed fixation drift demonstrating eccentric fixation. Both eyes had reduced postoperative visual performance after uneventful cataract surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS: Because not every macular lesion noted on fundus examination or optical coherence tomography may be clinically significant, microperimetry can be useful to detect clinically significant retinal dysfunction prior to cataract surgery. The outcome may aid in the selection of intraocular lens type and may yield a better documented surgical prognosis. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
METHODS: One randomly chosen eye of 10 patients diagnosed as having mild (1+) to moderate (3+) cataract was evaluated before and 1 week after cataract surgery with the MAIA microperimeter (Centervue S.p.A, Padova, Italy). Corrected distance visual acuity, dilated and undilated biomicroscopy and indirect fundus examinations, intraocular pressure measurement, and a MAIA microperimeter test to measure macular sensitivity and fixation pattern were also performed.
RESULTS: Two patients showed macular abnormalities before and after surgery that were noted on MAIA testing: one patient showed reduced average threshold sensitivity and abnormal percent reduced threshold, whereas the other patient showed fixation drift demonstrating eccentric fixation. Both eyes had reduced postoperative visual performance after uneventful cataract surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS: Because not every macular lesion noted on fundus examination or optical coherence tomography may be clinically significant, microperimetry can be useful to detect clinically significant retinal dysfunction prior to cataract surgery. The outcome may aid in the selection of intraocular lens type and may yield a better documented surgical prognosis. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.