DOI 10.1186/s13287-025-04793-6
Phenotypes in Brugada syndrome with different genotypes triggered by fever or inflammation using gene-edited iPSCs.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Fever or inflammation state may enhance the Brugada syndrome (BrS) phenotype in some but not all patients. However, the underlying mechanism in human cardiomyocytes has not yet been clarified.
METHODS
Human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) lines generated from fibroblasts of three BrS patients harboring variants in SCN10A (abbreviated as BrS1) and CACNB2 (abbreviated as BrS2), SCN5A (abbreviated as BrS3) and one healthy donor (abbreviated as WT) and a site-corrected (using CRISPR/Cas9) hiPSC line of each BrS patient (abbreviated as isogenic1, isogenic2 and isogenic3) were used for differentiation into cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs). Western blot, patch clamp and calcium transient analyses were carried out.
RESULTS
All 3 BrS cell lines showed a significantly reduced peak sodium current (INa) compared with isogenic or WT cells at baseline. Hyperthermia challenge (40 °C) significantly decreased INa and enhanced arrhythmogeneity in BrS1 and BrS3 but not in BrS2 cells. The hyperthermia effects involved PKA reduction. The lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge exacerbated the phenotype in electrophysiological characteristics in all 3 BrS cell lines. ROS-Blocker abolished the LPS effects in all BrS hiPSC-CMs, while an interleukin-6 receptor blocker abolished the proarrhythmic effect of LPS in BrS1 and BrS3 hiPSC-CMs but not in hiPSC-CMs of BrS2.
CONCLUSIONS
Hyperthermia exacerbated the BrS phenotype in hiPSC-CMs carrying SCN10A and SCN5A variants, whereas LPS aggravated the phenotype in all three BrS variants through distinct mechanisms; Hyperthermia and LPS effects on BrS phenotype may be genotype-dependent.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.