Heart rhythm · 2025
From blood to heartbeat: Plasma proteins and Brugada syndrome revealed by Mendelian randomization.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Zehao, Cao Binbin, Guo Haotian, Li Jiahui, Chen Xiaomin
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome (BrS) is a hereditary arrhythmia characterized by distinctive electrocardiographic patterns and a high risk of sudden cardiac death. Although SCN5A mutations account for 20%-30% of cases, the majority remain unexplained. Recent evidence suggests plasma proteins may contribute to BrS pathogenesis through non-ion channel mechanisms, such as inflammation and metabolism, although causal roles are unclear.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the causal relationship between plasma proteins and BrS using Mendelian randomization (MR) and explore underlying molecular mechanisms.
METHODS: Using pQTL proteomic data from a Finnish cohort, we evaluated causal associations between 4185 plasma proteins and BrS via MR. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analysis, supported by additional MR methods and sensitivity tests to ensure robustness. MR-CAUSE was used to identify proteins with unique causal patterns. For significant proteins, we constructed protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and performed Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses. A machine learning-based model integrated these results to prioritize candidate proteins.
RESULTS: 20 plasma proteins were identified as potentially associated with BrS. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings. HSPB1, MAPKAPK2, PDLIM4, and MMP1 emerged as top candidates based on causal strength, biological relevance, and network centrality.
CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the molecular landscape of BrS and identifies high-priority plasma proteins for further investigation. Experimental and clinical validation is needed to evaluate their diagnostic and therapeutic potential.
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess the causal relationship between plasma proteins and BrS using Mendelian randomization (MR) and explore underlying molecular mechanisms.
METHODS: Using pQTL proteomic data from a Finnish cohort, we evaluated causal associations between 4185 plasma proteins and BrS via MR. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analysis, supported by additional MR methods and sensitivity tests to ensure robustness. MR-CAUSE was used to identify proteins with unique causal patterns. For significant proteins, we constructed protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and performed Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analyses. A machine learning-based model integrated these results to prioritize candidate proteins.
RESULTS: 20 plasma proteins were identified as potentially associated with BrS. Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings. HSPB1, MAPKAPK2, PDLIM4, and MMP1 emerged as top candidates based on causal strength, biological relevance, and network centrality.
CONCLUSION: This study provides insight into the molecular landscape of BrS and identifies high-priority plasma proteins for further investigation. Experimental and clinical validation is needed to evaluate their diagnostic and therapeutic potential.