Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration · 2024
A comparison between bioelectrical impedance analysis and air-displacement plethysmography in assessing fat-free mass in patients with motor neurone diseases: a cross-sectional study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Janse van Mantgem Mark R, Soors D'Ancona Maaike L, Meyjes Myrte, Van Den Berg Leonard H, Steenhagen Elles, Kok Annemieke, Van Eijk Ruben P A
Аннотация
AIM: To determine the validity of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in quantifying fat-free mass (FFM) compared to air-displacement plethysmography (ADP) in patients with a motor neurone disease (MND).
METHODS: FFM of 140 patients diagnosed with MND was determined by ADP using the BodPod (i.e. the gold standard), and by BIA using the whole-body Bodystat. FFM values were translated to predicted resting energy expenditure (REE); the actual REE was measured using indirect calorimetry, resulting in a metabolic index. Validity of the BIA compared to the ADP was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's r. To assess the clinical relevance of differences, we evaluated changes in metabolic index and in individualized protein demand.
RESULTS: Despite the high correlation between ADP and BIA (r = 0.93), averaged across patients, the assessed mean fat-free mass was 51.7 kg (± 0.9) using ADP and 54.2 kg (± 1.0) using BIA. Hence, BIA overestimated fat-free mass by 2.5 kg (95% CI 1.8-3.2, p < 0.001). Clinically, an increased metabolic index would be more often underdiagnosed in patients with MND using BIA (31.4% according to BIA versus 44.2% according to ADP, p = 0.048). A clinically relevant overestimation of ≥ 15 g in protein demand was observed for 4 (2.9%) patients using BIA.
CONCLUSIONS: BIA systematically overestimates FFM in patients with MND. Although the differences are limited with ADP, underscoring the utility of BIA for research, overestimation of fat-free mass may have consequences for clinical decision-making, especially when interest lies in determining the metabolic index.
METHODS: FFM of 140 patients diagnosed with MND was determined by ADP using the BodPod (i.e. the gold standard), and by BIA using the whole-body Bodystat. FFM values were translated to predicted resting energy expenditure (REE); the actual REE was measured using indirect calorimetry, resulting in a metabolic index. Validity of the BIA compared to the ADP was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's r. To assess the clinical relevance of differences, we evaluated changes in metabolic index and in individualized protein demand.
RESULTS: Despite the high correlation between ADP and BIA (r = 0.93), averaged across patients, the assessed mean fat-free mass was 51.7 kg (± 0.9) using ADP and 54.2 kg (± 1.0) using BIA. Hence, BIA overestimated fat-free mass by 2.5 kg (95% CI 1.8-3.2, p < 0.001). Clinically, an increased metabolic index would be more often underdiagnosed in patients with MND using BIA (31.4% according to BIA versus 44.2% according to ADP, p = 0.048). A clinically relevant overestimation of ≥ 15 g in protein demand was observed for 4 (2.9%) patients using BIA.
CONCLUSIONS: BIA systematically overestimates FFM in patients with MND. Although the differences are limited with ADP, underscoring the utility of BIA for research, overestimation of fat-free mass may have consequences for clinical decision-making, especially when interest lies in determining the metabolic index.