Muscle & nerve · 2023
Facial nerve vulnerability in spinal muscular atrophy and motor unit number index of the orbicularis oculi muscle.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barp Andrea, Carraro Elena, Salmin Francesca, Lizio Andrea, Cheli Marta, Sansone Valeria
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Measures for assessing cranial nerve vulnerability in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have not yet been determined. Motor unit number index (MUNIX) studies have shown correlations with disease severity but have been used only in limb muscles. In the present study, we explore facial nerve response, MUNIX, and motor unit size index (MUSIX) of the orbicularis oculi muscle in a cohort of patients with SMA.
METHODS: Facial nerve response (measured as compound muscle action potential, CMAP), MUNIX, and MUSIX of the orbicularis oculi muscle were cross-sectionally recorded in patients with SMA and compared to healthy control subjects (HCs). Active maximum mouth opening (aMMO) was also measured at baseline in our SMA cohort.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with SMA (21 SMA II; 16 SMA III) and 27 HCs were recruited. CMAP of the facial nerve and MUNIX of orbicularis oculi proved to be feasible and well tolerated techniques. CMAP amplitude and MUNIX scores were significantly lower in patients with SMA compared to HCs (p < .0001). Both MUNIX and CMAP amplitude were significantly higher in patients with SMA III compared to SMA II. No significant difference emerged comparing CMAP amplitude, MUNIX and MUSIX scores between those with different functional status or nusinersen treatment.
DISCUSSION: Our results provide neurophysiological evidence of facial nerve and muscle involvement in patients with SMA. CMAP of the facial nerve and MUNIX of orbicularis oculi showed high accuracy in discriminating between the various subtypes of SMA and in quantifying the motor unit loss of the facial nerve.
METHODS: Facial nerve response (measured as compound muscle action potential, CMAP), MUNIX, and MUSIX of the orbicularis oculi muscle were cross-sectionally recorded in patients with SMA and compared to healthy control subjects (HCs). Active maximum mouth opening (aMMO) was also measured at baseline in our SMA cohort.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with SMA (21 SMA II; 16 SMA III) and 27 HCs were recruited. CMAP of the facial nerve and MUNIX of orbicularis oculi proved to be feasible and well tolerated techniques. CMAP amplitude and MUNIX scores were significantly lower in patients with SMA compared to HCs (p < .0001). Both MUNIX and CMAP amplitude were significantly higher in patients with SMA III compared to SMA II. No significant difference emerged comparing CMAP amplitude, MUNIX and MUSIX scores between those with different functional status or nusinersen treatment.
DISCUSSION: Our results provide neurophysiological evidence of facial nerve and muscle involvement in patients with SMA. CMAP of the facial nerve and MUNIX of orbicularis oculi showed high accuracy in discriminating between the various subtypes of SMA and in quantifying the motor unit loss of the facial nerve.