Journal of cardiology · 2020
Angioscopic assessments and clinical outcomes one year after polymer-free biolimus A9-coated coronary stent implantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tsujimura Takuya, Ishihara Takayuki, Okuno Shota, Iida Osamu, Kurata Naoya, Asai Mitsutoshi, Masuda Masaharu, Okamoto Shin, Nanto Kiyonori, Kanda Takashi, Matsuda Yasuhiro, Hata Yosuke, Mano Toshiaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Polymer-free biolimus A9-coated coronary stent (DCS) has novel features which lead to the expectation of better arterial healing. However, comparisons of intravascular status between DCS and drug-eluting stents (DES), and robust real-word clinical assessments of DCS have been lacking to date.
METHODS: From September 2017 to September 2018, we evaluated the intra-vascular status of 74 DCS implanted in 55 lesions from 43 patients using coronary angioscopy (CAS) approximately one year after implantation from a cohort of 219 lesions in 158 patients. We set 239 second-generation durable-polymer DES (DP-DES) implanted in 211 lesions from 180 patients from a cohort of 2652 lesions in 1914 patients as the control. Angioscopic images were analyzed to determine (1) the dominant degree of neointimal coverage (NIC) over the stent; (2) the heterogeneity of NIC; (3) yellow color grade of the stented segment; and (4) the presence of intra-stent thrombus. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombus and secondary outcomes were the other CAS findings, and the 1-year clinical outcomes which included target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). To minimize inter-group differences in baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed for clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Incidence of thrombus adhesion was similar in DCS and DP-DES groups (28.4% versus 22.6%, p=0.31). However, the dominant NIC grade was significantly higher in DCS (p<0.001), while NIC was more heterogeneous in DCS than in DP-DES (p=0.001). Maximum yellow color grade was similar (p=0.22). After propensity score matching, 202 lesion pairs from 146 patient pairs were retained for analysis. The cumulative incidence of TLR (4.6% versus 3.8%, p=0.38) and MACE (11.6% versus 11.7%, p=0.84) was similar for DCS and DP-DES.
CONCLUSIONS: DCS showed thrombus adhesion and clinical outcomes at 1 year similar to DP-DES. DCS can thus be used with similar safety and efficacy as DP-DES.
METHODS: From September 2017 to September 2018, we evaluated the intra-vascular status of 74 DCS implanted in 55 lesions from 43 patients using coronary angioscopy (CAS) approximately one year after implantation from a cohort of 219 lesions in 158 patients. We set 239 second-generation durable-polymer DES (DP-DES) implanted in 211 lesions from 180 patients from a cohort of 2652 lesions in 1914 patients as the control. Angioscopic images were analyzed to determine (1) the dominant degree of neointimal coverage (NIC) over the stent; (2) the heterogeneity of NIC; (3) yellow color grade of the stented segment; and (4) the presence of intra-stent thrombus. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombus and secondary outcomes were the other CAS findings, and the 1-year clinical outcomes which included target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). To minimize inter-group differences in baseline characteristics, propensity score matching was performed for clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Incidence of thrombus adhesion was similar in DCS and DP-DES groups (28.4% versus 22.6%, p=0.31). However, the dominant NIC grade was significantly higher in DCS (p<0.001), while NIC was more heterogeneous in DCS than in DP-DES (p=0.001). Maximum yellow color grade was similar (p=0.22). After propensity score matching, 202 lesion pairs from 146 patient pairs were retained for analysis. The cumulative incidence of TLR (4.6% versus 3.8%, p=0.38) and MACE (11.6% versus 11.7%, p=0.84) was similar for DCS and DP-DES.
CONCLUSIONS: DCS showed thrombus adhesion and clinical outcomes at 1 year similar to DP-DES. DCS can thus be used with similar safety and efficacy as DP-DES.