Journal of Nippon Medical School = Nippon Ika Daigaku zasshi · 2010
Surgical venous thrombectomy for Japanese patients with acute deep vein thrombosis: a review of 5 years' experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kutsukata Noriyoshi, Mashiko Kunihiro, Matsumoto Hisashi, Hara Yoshiaki, Sakamoto Yuichiro, Yokota Hiroyuki, Yamauchi Hitoshi, Ochi Masami
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a major risk factor for pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE). We carefully selected patients for surgical thrombectomy to treat acute-phase thrombosis and obtained favorable results.
METHODS: Over the past 5 years, we have performed surgical thrombectomy via a minimum femoral skin incision in 11 patients. Surgery was considered for patients with persistent phlegmasia cerulea dolens, despite thrombolytic therapy. All of our patients underwent surgery within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. During the operation, the patients were kept in the supine anti-Trendelenburg position to prevent PTE, and general anesthesia was maintained with positive-pressure mechanical ventilation. Blood flow to the inferior vena cava was occluded with a blocking catheter, and thrombectomy was performed with a thrombectomy catheter inserted parallel to the blocking catheter. A cell separator device was used effectively for autologous blood transfusion. To prevent reocclusion and promote collateral perfusion, we constructed an arteriovenous fistula for an iliac venous spur.
RESULTS: There were no major postoperative complications, such as PTE or peritoneal bleeding, and no cases of postthrombotic syndrome after an average 38.4 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This surgical technique for venous thrombectomy is minimally invasive and safe for Japanese patients; surgical thrombectomy should be considered a treatment option for DVT in Japan.
METHODS: Over the past 5 years, we have performed surgical thrombectomy via a minimum femoral skin incision in 11 patients. Surgery was considered for patients with persistent phlegmasia cerulea dolens, despite thrombolytic therapy. All of our patients underwent surgery within 14 days of the onset of symptoms. During the operation, the patients were kept in the supine anti-Trendelenburg position to prevent PTE, and general anesthesia was maintained with positive-pressure mechanical ventilation. Blood flow to the inferior vena cava was occluded with a blocking catheter, and thrombectomy was performed with a thrombectomy catheter inserted parallel to the blocking catheter. A cell separator device was used effectively for autologous blood transfusion. To prevent reocclusion and promote collateral perfusion, we constructed an arteriovenous fistula for an iliac venous spur.
RESULTS: There were no major postoperative complications, such as PTE or peritoneal bleeding, and no cases of postthrombotic syndrome after an average 38.4 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSION: This surgical technique for venous thrombectomy is minimally invasive and safe for Japanese patients; surgical thrombectomy should be considered a treatment option for DVT in Japan.