Applied nursing research : ANR · 2018
Perceptions of low income HIV+ persons about finding accurate web-based health information.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nokes Kathleen M, Reyes Darcel M, Hickey Dorothy E
Аннотация
AIM: To explore perceptions of low income persons living with HIV/AIDS and history of substance abuse about how they decide whether an internet site is a credible source of health-related information.
BACKGROUND: It is hard for any consumer to determine whether the information that is available on the internet is trustworthy and even more challenging for consumers with low health literacy and insufficient computer literacy skills.
METHODS: Mixed methods with sequential explanatory design. Electronic health literacy was measured with eHEALS and a new instrument to measure confidence in choosing a credible internet site for health-related information was developed. Qualitative data were collected during three focus groups held in high prevalence neighborhoods in New York City and after participants watched a 16-minute video produced by the United States National Library of Medicine.
RESULTS: Participants had low electronic health literacy and there was no relationship between electronic health literacy and confidence in identifying a credible internet site. Six themes emerged: I haven't learned enough from the Medline video; I am not computer literate; the Internet has too many scams; the Internet piques interest in learning health-related information; prefer 1:1 interactions with trusted source for health information; and you don't have to expose HIV status to get information.
CONCLUSION: Low income persons are interested in using the internet for health information but reluctant to do so due to multiple complex barriers. Follow-up interventions would include skills training in which persons are taught how to identify credible sites.
BACKGROUND: It is hard for any consumer to determine whether the information that is available on the internet is trustworthy and even more challenging for consumers with low health literacy and insufficient computer literacy skills.
METHODS: Mixed methods with sequential explanatory design. Electronic health literacy was measured with eHEALS and a new instrument to measure confidence in choosing a credible internet site for health-related information was developed. Qualitative data were collected during three focus groups held in high prevalence neighborhoods in New York City and after participants watched a 16-minute video produced by the United States National Library of Medicine.
RESULTS: Participants had low electronic health literacy and there was no relationship between electronic health literacy and confidence in identifying a credible internet site. Six themes emerged: I haven't learned enough from the Medline video; I am not computer literate; the Internet has too many scams; the Internet piques interest in learning health-related information; prefer 1:1 interactions with trusted source for health information; and you don't have to expose HIV status to get information.
CONCLUSION: Low income persons are interested in using the internet for health information but reluctant to do so due to multiple complex barriers. Follow-up interventions would include skills training in which persons are taught how to identify credible sites.