American journal of ophthalmology · 2025
Refining Intraocular Lens Power Calculations With Prediction Modifications: A Multiformula Analysis in High-Power Lenses.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Chung Min, Park Nahyun, Lee Yea Eun, Han Jeewon, Yu So Hyun, Kim Sang Yoon, Kaufmann Cecily L, Kim Taehun, Kim Tae Yeon, Eah Kyu Sang, Chung Ho Seok, Kim Jae Yong, Koh Kyung Min, Cooke David L, Lee Hun
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of prediction modifications (PMOD) in improving refractive accuracy of modern intraocular lens (IOL) formulas in high-power TECNIS IOLs.
DESIGN: Retrospective accuracy and validity analysis.
SUBJECTS: Eyes with high-power and central power diopter IOL undergoing cataract surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 645 eyes (497 patients) implanted with TECNIS ZCB00 or ICB00 IOLs. Eyes were stratified into central power (17.5-23.5 D) and high-power (>23.5 D) groups. Formula constants were optimized using the central power group and applied to both groups. PMOD, based on prior large-scale regression data, were applied to the high-power group. Twelve IOL power formulas were evaluated before and after PMOD application. Prediction errors were analyzed using mean refractive error (MRE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) with the Wilcox-Holladay-Wang-Koch method.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MRE, MAE, and RMSAE.
RESULTS: In the high-power group, eyes exhibited significantly shorter axial length, shallower anterior chamber depth, and greater lens thickness (all P < .001). All formulas, including Barrett Universal II, Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Holladay 2 with nonlinear regression (H2 NLR), Kane, Olsen, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, and T2, achieved -0.01 to 0.01 D MRE after optimization in the central power (17.5-23.5 D) group. In the high-power (>23.5 D) group, PMOD effectively corrected the myopic shift, significantly reducing MRE, MAE, and RMSAE across all formulas (all P < .05), except for MAE in PEARL-DGS (P = .050).
CONCLUSIONS: PMOD is a simple diopter-specific adjustment applied to the formula-predicted spherical equivalent. It effectively improved refractive prediction accuracy and reduced residual systematic errors that persisted in high-power IOLs across formulas, even after applying constants optimized in the central power group.
DESIGN: Retrospective accuracy and validity analysis.
SUBJECTS: Eyes with high-power and central power diopter IOL undergoing cataract surgery.
METHODS: This retrospective study included 645 eyes (497 patients) implanted with TECNIS ZCB00 or ICB00 IOLs. Eyes were stratified into central power (17.5-23.5 D) and high-power (>23.5 D) groups. Formula constants were optimized using the central power group and applied to both groups. PMOD, based on prior large-scale regression data, were applied to the high-power group. Twelve IOL power formulas were evaluated before and after PMOD application. Prediction errors were analyzed using mean refractive error (MRE), mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square absolute error (RMSAE) with the Wilcox-Holladay-Wang-Koch method.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MRE, MAE, and RMSAE.
RESULTS: In the high-power group, eyes exhibited significantly shorter axial length, shallower anterior chamber depth, and greater lens thickness (all P < .001). All formulas, including Barrett Universal II, Cooke K6, EVO 2.0, Haigis, Hoffer QST, Holladay 1, Holladay 2 with nonlinear regression (H2 NLR), Kane, Olsen, PEARL-DGS, SRK/T, and T2, achieved -0.01 to 0.01 D MRE after optimization in the central power (17.5-23.5 D) group. In the high-power (>23.5 D) group, PMOD effectively corrected the myopic shift, significantly reducing MRE, MAE, and RMSAE across all formulas (all P < .05), except for MAE in PEARL-DGS (P = .050).
CONCLUSIONS: PMOD is a simple diopter-specific adjustment applied to the formula-predicted spherical equivalent. It effectively improved refractive prediction accuracy and reduced residual systematic errors that persisted in high-power IOLs across formulas, even after applying constants optimized in the central power group.