Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2014
Ruptures of the device landing zone in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: an analysis of TAVI Karlsruhe (TAVIK) patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schymik Gerhard, Heimeshoff Martin, Bramlage Peter, Wondraschek Rainer, Süselbeck Tim, Gerhardus Jan, Luik Armin, Posival Herbert, Schmitt Claus, Schröfel Holger
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Aortic rupture of the device landing zone is a rare complication of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and it is associated with significant mortality.
METHODS: This study reports on the experience of a single-center in a case series of more than 1,000 implants. We explored patient and procedural characteristics aiming at identifying variables that increase the risk for aortic root rupture.
RESULTS: Among a total of 1,000 TAVI procedures, six patients (0.6 %) had a rupture of the device landing zone. Five of these patients received the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valve (5/813; 0.62 %) of which four had a supraannular and one a subannular rupture. One patient received the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve (1/199; 0.5 %; p = n.s. vs. SAPIEN) and had an annular rupture. Factors that were associated with aortic rupture were: (1) the relative size of the valve compared with the aortic annulus and its geometric form; (2) the need for post-dilation of the new valve because of paravalvular leakage; and (3) the location and severity of calcification. We determined, to avoid aortic rupture, caution may be necessary in the presence of the following conditions: (1) flat sinuses of Valsalva and severe calcifications of either the body or the free edge of the aortic cusps (supraannular rupture); (2) an ellipsoid annulus and bulky calcifications on either the base of the cusps or the rim of the annulus (annular rupture); and (3) a narrow left-ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and bulky calcification of the LVOT (subannular rupture). After considering these precautions, we observed no case of aortic root rupture in the following 600 cases.
CONCLUSION: The data indicate that to reduce the frequency of aortic rupture, a careful pre-procedural planning appears essential to avoid this serious and potentially deleterious complication.
METHODS: This study reports on the experience of a single-center in a case series of more than 1,000 implants. We explored patient and procedural characteristics aiming at identifying variables that increase the risk for aortic root rupture.
RESULTS: Among a total of 1,000 TAVI procedures, six patients (0.6 %) had a rupture of the device landing zone. Five of these patients received the balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN valve (5/813; 0.62 %) of which four had a supraannular and one a subannular rupture. One patient received the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve (1/199; 0.5 %; p = n.s. vs. SAPIEN) and had an annular rupture. Factors that were associated with aortic rupture were: (1) the relative size of the valve compared with the aortic annulus and its geometric form; (2) the need for post-dilation of the new valve because of paravalvular leakage; and (3) the location and severity of calcification. We determined, to avoid aortic rupture, caution may be necessary in the presence of the following conditions: (1) flat sinuses of Valsalva and severe calcifications of either the body or the free edge of the aortic cusps (supraannular rupture); (2) an ellipsoid annulus and bulky calcifications on either the base of the cusps or the rim of the annulus (annular rupture); and (3) a narrow left-ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and bulky calcification of the LVOT (subannular rupture). After considering these precautions, we observed no case of aortic root rupture in the following 600 cases.
CONCLUSION: The data indicate that to reduce the frequency of aortic rupture, a careful pre-procedural planning appears essential to avoid this serious and potentially deleterious complication.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Academic Medical CentersAgedAged, 80 and overAortic RuptureAortic Valve StenosisCohort StudiesEchocardiography, DopplerEchocardiography, TransesophagealFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHeart Valve ProsthesisHospital MortalityHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexSurvival AnalysisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementTreatment Outcome