General hospital psychiatry · 2024
Establishment and clinical impacts of decision-support system for older patients with aortic valve stenosis: A retrospective observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kawano Sayoko, Eguchi Yoko, Oosumi Azusa, Takeuchi Hiroyoshi, Takubo Michiyo, Kimura Noriko, Nakano Naomi, Ryuzaki Toshinobu, Hayashida Kentaro, Ieda Masaki, Uchida Hiroyuki, Mimura Masaru, Fujisawa Daisuke
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Treatment decisions for severe aortic stenosis (AS) are complex, since there are two active and comparable options: transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement. The disease predominantly affects older individuals, who are frequently comorbid with from cognitive impairment. This study aimed to establish a screening-triggered system to assess the decision-making capacity of patients with AS, support their decision-making, and facilitate referrals to specialists when necessary.
METHODS: This is a retrospective pre-post observational study. Relevant healthcare professionals were trained to assess and support patients' decision-making capacities.
RESULTS: Subtotals of 203 and 244 patients were enrolled before and after the implementation of the system, respectively. The requests for decision-making support significantly increased (from 1.5 % to 14.8 % of the patients). 11.5 % of the patients were identified as with declined decision-making capacity. The proportion of patients who received active treatments for AS significantly decreased from 95.0 % to 83.0 %. The nurses' documentation of patients' decision-making capacities significantly increased.
CONCLUSION: This screening-triggered system identified a substantial proportion of patients with declined decision-making capacity. A significant decrease in patients receiving active treatments for AS and increased documentation of patients' decision-making capacities in nursing records were observed. A future randomized controlled is warranted.
METHODS: This is a retrospective pre-post observational study. Relevant healthcare professionals were trained to assess and support patients' decision-making capacities.
RESULTS: Subtotals of 203 and 244 patients were enrolled before and after the implementation of the system, respectively. The requests for decision-making support significantly increased (from 1.5 % to 14.8 % of the patients). 11.5 % of the patients were identified as with declined decision-making capacity. The proportion of patients who received active treatments for AS significantly decreased from 95.0 % to 83.0 %. The nurses' documentation of patients' decision-making capacities significantly increased.
CONCLUSION: This screening-triggered system identified a substantial proportion of patients with declined decision-making capacity. A significant decrease in patients receiving active treatments for AS and increased documentation of patients' decision-making capacities in nursing records were observed. A future randomized controlled is warranted.