Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
Diagnostic yield of head-up tilt table test in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and unexplained syncope: the knot does not seem to be unraveling.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bozyel Serdar, Şaylık Faysal, Dalgıç Nur, Şipal Abdülcebbar, Önder Şükriye Ebru, Çağdaş Metin, Güler Tümer Erdem, Morillo Carlos A, Aksu Tolga
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Conflicting results have been published considering the diagnostic performance of head-up tilt test (HUTT) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of HUTT in the evaluation of unexplained syncope in patients with HCM.
METHODS: We performed a structured systematic database search using the following keywords: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, syncope, unexplained syncope, head-up tilt test, tilt table test, tilt testing, orthostatic stress, autonomic function, autonomic response. Studies in which the HUTT was used to define autonomic dysfunction in patients with syncope at baseline or without syncope were included in the final analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 252 HCM patients from 6 studies (159 patients without a history of syncope and 93 with a history of syncope, respectively) were evaluated. HUTT was positive in 50 (19.84%) of 252 patients (in 21 of 93 patients (22.58%) with a history of syncope and in 29 of 159 patients (18.24%) without a history of syncope, respectively). The pooled total sensitivity and specificity of the HUTT for detecting syncope were 22.1% (14.8-35.1%) and 83.6% (73.2-91.6%), respectively. The summary receiver operator curve showed that HUTT had an only modest discriminative ability for syncope with an area under the curve value of 0.565 (0.246-0.794).
CONCLUSION: Although HUTT has significant limitations in diagnosis of unexplained syncope in patients with HCM, it may still be used to determine hypotensive susceptibility. Other autonomic tests can be used in diagnostic workflow in this population.
METHODS: We performed a structured systematic database search using the following keywords: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, syncope, unexplained syncope, head-up tilt test, tilt table test, tilt testing, orthostatic stress, autonomic function, autonomic response. Studies in which the HUTT was used to define autonomic dysfunction in patients with syncope at baseline or without syncope were included in the final analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 252 HCM patients from 6 studies (159 patients without a history of syncope and 93 with a history of syncope, respectively) were evaluated. HUTT was positive in 50 (19.84%) of 252 patients (in 21 of 93 patients (22.58%) with a history of syncope and in 29 of 159 patients (18.24%) without a history of syncope, respectively). The pooled total sensitivity and specificity of the HUTT for detecting syncope were 22.1% (14.8-35.1%) and 83.6% (73.2-91.6%), respectively. The summary receiver operator curve showed that HUTT had an only modest discriminative ability for syncope with an area under the curve value of 0.565 (0.246-0.794).
CONCLUSION: Although HUTT has significant limitations in diagnosis of unexplained syncope in patients with HCM, it may still be used to determine hypotensive susceptibility. Other autonomic tests can be used in diagnostic workflow in this population.