MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · No to shinkei = Brain and nerve · 2006

[Objective evaluation of the visual field defects in a patient with cerebral infarction using multifocal VEPs].

Yukawa Eiichi, Saitou Kozue, Kim Yeong-Jin, Maruoka Shinji, Kanzaki Mamiko, Hara Yoshiaki

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: We investigated whether visual field defects can be objectively evaluated using multifocal visual evoked potentials (mVEP) in a patient with cerebral infarction in whom it is difficult to measure the visual field.

METHODS

To determine normal waves in mVEP recording was performed using a VERIS Junior Science (Mayo, Aichi, Japan) in 20 healthy subjects (20 eyes), peak latency and amplitude were used for assessment. In a patient with cerebral infarction, mVEP were recorded, and compared with the lesion observed by computed tomography.

RESULTS

In 20 healthy subjects, the waveforms in the nasal and temporal quadrants were very similar but the waveforms in the superior and inferior quadrants were mirror images. The mVEP in patient with cerebral infarction showed abnormal waves, corresponding to the visual field defects in the lesion observed by computed tomography.

CONCLUSIONS

Objective evaluation of visual field defects using mVEP may be useful in patients with cerebral infarction in whom kinetic/static perimetry as a subjective examination is difficult.

Для цитирования: Yukawa Eiichi, Saitou Kozue, Kim Yeong-Jin, Maruoka Shinji, Kanzaki Mamiko, Hara Yoshiaki. [Objective evaluation of the visual field defects in a patient with cerebral infarction using multifocal VEPs].. No to shinkei = Brain and nerve. 2006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.