Klinika oczna · 2005
[Flicker perimetry (CFF) in patients with lens opacities--first report].
Сравнительное исследованиеАннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kinasz Renata, Zawojska Izabela, Dudziński Andrzej, Wygledowska-Promieńska Dorota
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Comparison of standard W/W and CFF perimetry in patients with cataract and lens opacities.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visual field was measured on Octopus 301 perimeter with option flicker perimetry. W/W and CFF perimetry (Program G1 in TOP strategy) was performed in 44 eyes with cataract and lens opacities.
RESULTS: Defects in visual field with CFF perimetry were found in 24% of cases but with W/W perimetry in 100% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Perimetry CFF is a new tool for early detection and follow up of visual field defects in patients with cataract and lens opacities.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Visual field was measured on Octopus 301 perimeter with option flicker perimetry. W/W and CFF perimetry (Program G1 in TOP strategy) was performed in 44 eyes with cataract and lens opacities.
RESULTS: Defects in visual field with CFF perimetry were found in 24% of cases but with W/W perimetry in 100% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Perimetry CFF is a new tool for early detection and follow up of visual field defects in patients with cataract and lens opacities.