MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010358

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2012

Reconstructive endovascular treatment of a ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm using the Pipeline embolization device.

Ducruet Andrew F, Crowley R Webster, Albuquerque Felipe C, McDougall Cameron G

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The Pipeline embolization device has been used successfully to treat intracranial aneurysms with difficult morphologies. However, the need for dual antiplatelet therapy has limited its use after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

CASE REPORT: A 42-year-old woman with a ruptured dissecting aneurysm of her dominant vertebral artery (V4) was successfully treated by Pipeline embolization with preservation of flow through a covered posterior inferior cerebellar artery. This strategy preserved endovascular access for the treatment of severe posterior circulation vasospasm. She was a non-responder to thienopyridine agents and was thus maintained on aspirin and heparin, which was transitioned to warfarin following ventricular drain removal. The aneurysm remains angiographically obliterated at 6 months. Despite a moribund presentation and an extended hospitalization, she has made a remarkable neurological recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Pipeline embolization may be used to treat a ruptured dissecting aneurysm in selected cases where parent vessel preservation is paramount.

Для цитирования: Ducruet Andrew F, Crowley R Webster, Albuquerque Felipe C, McDougall Cameron G. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of a ruptured vertebral artery dissecting aneurysm using the Pipeline embolization device.. Journal of neurointerventional surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010358.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.