MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jnis.2010.004572

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2011

Treatment of two blood blister-like aneurysms with flow diverter stenting.

Consoli Arturo, Nappini Sergio, Renieri Leonardo, Limbucci Nicola, Ricciardi Fabrizio, Mangiafico Salvatore

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Neurosurgical and endovascular treatment of fragile and recurrent aneurysms of the non-branching portion of the internal carotid artery, known as blister-like aneurysms, is challenging. The aim of this paper is to describe two cases of ruptured blister-like aneurysms of the internal carotid artery and of the vertebral artery at the origin of the postero-inferior cerebellar artery, which were both treated with flow diverter (FD) stents.

METHODS

Two patients with a sub-arachnoid hemorrhage secondary to the rupture of a blister-like aneurysm were treated with a Pipeline (ev3, Irvine, California, USA) stent. Digital subtraction angiography and clinical follow-up were carried out.

RESULTS

Both patients treated with FD stents had an excellent clinical (modified Rankin Scale, mRS 0) and angiographic outcome. In both cases the aneurysms were completely excluded after 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the use of this endovascular approach is still debated because of poor experience and pharmacological limitations, FD stents may represent a valid alternative approach for treatment of this aneurysm subtype.

Для цитирования: Consoli Arturo, Nappini Sergio, Renieri Leonardo, Limbucci Nicola, Ricciardi Fabrizio, Mangiafico Salvatore. Treatment of two blood blister-like aneurysms with flow diverter stenting.. Journal of neurointerventional surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2010.004572.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.