Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2026
Energy Expenditure During Walking in Adults: Impact of Body Mass Index and Sex.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Beaumont Joshua S, Gaesser Glenn A, Adams Marc A, Peterson Daniel S, Dickinson Jared M, Patrie James T, Angadi Siddhartha S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine if the linear and nonlinear coefficients of the energy expenditure-walking speed relationship are influenced by body mass index (BMI; kg/m 2) and sex.
METHODS: Participants (n=182; 96 females) ages 18-60 yr walked at 0.89 m/s (2.0 mph), 1.34 m/s (3.0 mph), and 1.79 m/s (4.0 mph) for six min each while oxygen uptake (V̇O2; mL/kg/min) was calculated via indirect calorimetry and converted to energy expenditure (EE; W/kg). Net W/kg was calculated by subtracting standing W/kg from gross W/kg. Polynomial random coefficient regression (PRCR) was employed to produce individual-level linear and quadratic coefficients to assess whether BMI influenced W/kg during walking. Net energy cost of walking (Cw; J/kg/m) was also determined for each walking speed.
RESULTS: Net W/kg and Cw were not significantly correlated with BMI at 0.89 m/s and 1.79 m/s, but were weakly inversely correlated (r 2 < 0.03) with BMI at 1.34 m/s. BMI was not significantly correlated with the linear coefficient for net or gross W/kg (both r = 0.07), but was weakly correlated with the quadratic coefficient for net (r = 0.17, P = 0.02) and gross (r = 0.16, P = 0.04) W/kg (r 2 < 0.03 for both). However, PRCR coefficients did not differ between normal weight BMI (n=32; 18.5-<25.0 kg/m 2), overweight (n=74; 25-<30.0 kg/m 2) and obese (n=76; >30.0 kg/m 2) groups. Females had higher W/kg, but sex differences were eliminated after controlling for height.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that BMI has little impact on the EE of walking at speeds between 0.89 m/s and 1.79 m/s, and that sex differences in walking EE are eliminated after controlling for height.
METHODS: Participants (n=182; 96 females) ages 18-60 yr walked at 0.89 m/s (2.0 mph), 1.34 m/s (3.0 mph), and 1.79 m/s (4.0 mph) for six min each while oxygen uptake (V̇O2; mL/kg/min) was calculated via indirect calorimetry and converted to energy expenditure (EE; W/kg). Net W/kg was calculated by subtracting standing W/kg from gross W/kg. Polynomial random coefficient regression (PRCR) was employed to produce individual-level linear and quadratic coefficients to assess whether BMI influenced W/kg during walking. Net energy cost of walking (Cw; J/kg/m) was also determined for each walking speed.
RESULTS: Net W/kg and Cw were not significantly correlated with BMI at 0.89 m/s and 1.79 m/s, but were weakly inversely correlated (r 2 < 0.03) with BMI at 1.34 m/s. BMI was not significantly correlated with the linear coefficient for net or gross W/kg (both r = 0.07), but was weakly correlated with the quadratic coefficient for net (r = 0.17, P = 0.02) and gross (r = 0.16, P = 0.04) W/kg (r 2 < 0.03 for both). However, PRCR coefficients did not differ between normal weight BMI (n=32; 18.5-<25.0 kg/m 2), overweight (n=74; 25-<30.0 kg/m 2) and obese (n=76; >30.0 kg/m 2) groups. Females had higher W/kg, but sex differences were eliminated after controlling for height.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that BMI has little impact on the EE of walking at speeds between 0.89 m/s and 1.79 m/s, and that sex differences in walking EE are eliminated after controlling for height.