Thrombosis research · 2024
Comparative analysis of thrombin generation platforms for patients with coagulation factor deficiencies: A comprehensive assessment.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haisma Bauke, Schols Saskia E M, van Oerle René G M, Verbeek-Knobbe Kitty, Hellenbrand Dave, Verwoerd Evelien J, Heubel-Moenen Floor C J I, Stroobants An K, Meijer Danielle, Rijpma Sanna R, Henskens Yvonne M C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Thrombin generation assays (TGAs) assess the overall functionality of the hemostatic system and thereby provide a reflection of the hemostatic capacity of patients with disorders in this system. Currently, four (semi-)automated TGA platforms are available: the Calibrated Automated Thrombogram, Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay, ST Genesia and Ceveron s100. In this study, we compared their performance for detecting patients with congenital single coagulation factor deficiencies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled patient samples, healthy control samples and normal pooled plasma were tested on all four platforms, using the available reagents that vary in tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations. The TGA parameters selected for analysis were peak height and thrombin potential. Results were normalized by using the calculated mean of healthy controls and a correction for between-run variation. Outcomes were presented as relative values, with the mean of healthy controls standardized to 100 %.
RESULTS: Across all platforms and reagents used, thrombin potentials and peak heights of samples with coagulation factor deficiencies were lower than those of healthy controls. Reagents designed for bleeding tendencies yielded the lowest values on all platforms (relative median peak height 19-32 %, relative median thrombin potential 19-45 %). Samples representing more severe coagulation factor deficiencies generally exhibited lower relative peak heights and thrombin potentials.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombin generation assays prove effective in differentiating single coagulation factor deficient samples from healthy controls, with modest discrepancies observed between the platforms. Reagents designed for assessing bleeding tendencies, featuring the lowest tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations, emerged as the most suitable option for detecting coagulation factor deficiencies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pooled patient samples, healthy control samples and normal pooled plasma were tested on all four platforms, using the available reagents that vary in tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations. The TGA parameters selected for analysis were peak height and thrombin potential. Results were normalized by using the calculated mean of healthy controls and a correction for between-run variation. Outcomes were presented as relative values, with the mean of healthy controls standardized to 100 %.
RESULTS: Across all platforms and reagents used, thrombin potentials and peak heights of samples with coagulation factor deficiencies were lower than those of healthy controls. Reagents designed for bleeding tendencies yielded the lowest values on all platforms (relative median peak height 19-32 %, relative median thrombin potential 19-45 %). Samples representing more severe coagulation factor deficiencies generally exhibited lower relative peak heights and thrombin potentials.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombin generation assays prove effective in differentiating single coagulation factor deficient samples from healthy controls, with modest discrepancies observed between the platforms. Reagents designed for assessing bleeding tendencies, featuring the lowest tissue factor and phospholipid concentrations, emerged as the most suitable option for detecting coagulation factor deficiencies.