MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmj-2024-082765

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025

A village doctor-led mobile health intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction in rural China: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Zhang Xingyi, Wang Siming, Zhou Xingyu, Tang Yajie, Xing Liying, Ma Shaoning, Xu Yan, Wu Chaoqun, Cui Jianlan, Yang Yang, Lin Chunying, Wu Yi, Zhang Haibo, Fan Lei, Xu Chunxiao, Li Xi, SMARTER Collaborative Group

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of a village doctor-led mobile health intervention on cardiovascular risk reduction among residents in rural China.

DESIGN

Cluster randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

127 villages from five provinces and autonomous regions in China.

PARTICIPANTS

4533 participants from 127 villages: 2297 (64 villages) were randomly assigned to the intervention group and 2236 (63 villages) to the control group. Participants were aged ≥35 years, had no established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) but a predicted 10 year risk of ≥10%, had contracted a family doctor service with the local village doctor, and owned a smart phone.

INTERVENTIONS: In addition to usual clinical care and basic public health services provided for the control group, the intervention led by village doctors included five components: assessing risk factors to identify individualised intervention targets, setting gradual goals based on doctor-participant communication, providing targeted short videos on health education, conducting health monitoring with periodic feedback, and providing motivation to reduce risk based on gamification.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mean change in predicted 10 year risk of ASCVD from baseline to 12 months.

RESULTS

Enrolment took place between March 2023 and May 2023. During the 12 month follow-up (completion rate 99.4%), the 10 year risk of ASCVD decreased from 18.0% to 11.7% in the intervention group and from 17.8% to 13.6% in the control group (absolute difference -1.88% (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.57% to -1.19%; P<0.001). Compared with the control group, the intervention group showed larger reductions in lifetime ASCVD risk (-15.9% v -11.0%; difference -4.59%; P<0.001), systolic blood pressure (-23.2 mm Hg v -15.2 mm Hg; difference -7.64 mm Hg; P<0.001), diastolic blood pressure (-10.9 mm Hg v -6.9 mm Hg; difference: -3.59 mm Hg; P<0.001), fasting blood glucose (-0.9 mmol/L v -0.5 mmol/L; difference -0.30 mmol/L; P=0.008), proportion of daily smokers (-3.1% v -0.6%; odds ratio 0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.84; P=0.003), and insufficient physical activity (-3.0% v 1.3%; odds ratio 0.63, 0.42 to 0.95; P=0.03). No significant differences were observed for change in non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol or proportion of participants with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

The village doctor-led mobile health intervention was effective at reducing cardiovascular risk and improving control of behavioural and metabolic risk factors. This feasible approach could be scaled up in rural China and other under-resourced settings to improve health management based on the local primary healthcare system.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05645640.

Для цитирования: Zhang Xingyi, Wang Siming, Zhou Xingyu, Tang Yajie, Xing Liying, Ma Shaoning, Xu Yan, Wu Chaoqun, Cui Jianlan, Yang Yang, Lin Chunying, Wu Yi, Zhang Haibo, Fan Lei, Xu Chunxiao, Li Xi, SMARTER Collaborative Group. A village doctor-led mobile health intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction in rural China: cluster randomised controlled trial.. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2025. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082765.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.