BJU international · 2007
Does a constriction ring alter ejaculation latency?
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hosseini Seyed Reza
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of a 'constriction ring' as an option for treating premature ejaculation (PE).
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2003 and October 2006, 42 men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) of <1 min were evaluated. Over a 4-week period, a constriction ring was used during intercourse.
RESULTS: The median (range) IELT was 42 (33-54) s before treatment and 46 (31-55) s after 4 weeks of using the ring; there was no statistically significant difference in the IELT before and after treatment (P = 0.1), and no major complications.
CONCLUSION: The 'constriction ring' is not an effective treatment for PE.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between September 2003 and October 2006, 42 men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) of <1 min were evaluated. Over a 4-week period, a constriction ring was used during intercourse.
RESULTS: The median (range) IELT was 42 (33-54) s before treatment and 46 (31-55) s after 4 weeks of using the ring; there was no statistically significant difference in the IELT before and after treatment (P = 0.1), and no major complications.
CONCLUSION: The 'constriction ring' is not an effective treatment for PE.